[OAUTH-WG] Re: Call for adoption - PIKA

I support adoption. From: Neil Madden Date: Tuesday, 3. September 2024 at 13:21 To: Rifaat Shekh-Yusef Cc: oauth Subject: [OAUTH-WG] Re: Call for adoption - PIKA CAUTION: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sende

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for adoption - OAuth 2.1 document

+1 I support adoption -- Andreas Falk Managing Consultant / Practice Lead Agile Security [Novatec Logo] T. +49 711 22040-700 ∙ M. +49 151 46146778 andreas.f...@novatec-gmbh.de ⋅ www.novatec-gmbh.de

Re: [OAUTH-WG] A proposal for OAuth WG Interim Meetings in place of IETF108

+1 Von: OAuth im Auftrag von Dick Hardt Gesendet: Sonntag, 21. Juni 2020 20:42 An: Rifaat Shekh-Yusef Cc: oauth Betreff: Re: [OAUTH-WG] A proposal for OAuth WG Interim Meetings in place of IETF108 +1 On Sat, Jun 20, 2020 at 12:34 PM Rifaat Shekh-Yusef mailt

Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth 2.1 - recalling ROPC

> Keep in mind that while the Security BCP explicitly forbids the use of the > Password grant in OAuth 2.0, technically OAuth 2.1 just never includes it in > the first place. Subtle difference. As RFC 6749 clearly targets third-party applications, ROPC never has been a good fit. It always fel