Re: [OAUTH-WG] delegated authentication with OAuth 2.0

2011-05-04 Thread Justin Hart
, but I've got a draft I need to update and submit for that :-) Justin Hart jh...@photobucket.com On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 8:45 AM, Eran Hammer-Lahav e...@hueniverse.comwrote: The way we do it is by having the user authenticate through the mobile app with the app server (using an embedded

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Bearer token scheme name - new vote deadline Sat, 2/12

2011-02-08 Thread Justin Hart
#2 Justin Hart jh...@photobucket.commailto:jh...@photobucket.com On Feb 8, 2011, at 4:04 PM, Mike Jones wrote: Given that people are clearly voting to change the bearer token scheme name, but that there is also significant discussion asking for “OAuth2” to be part of the name, I’d like

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Bearer token type and scheme name (deadline: 2/10)

2011-02-03 Thread Justin Hart
#1, which is nice to support the OAuth2 scheme as previously discussed (Hunt, etc) as a legacy type (can be specified in a migration spec). -- Justin Hart -- jh...@photobucket.commailto:jh...@photobucket.com On Feb 3, 2011, at 1:34 AM, Eran Hammer-Lahav wrote: After a long back

Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth2 chain flow

2011-01-18 Thread Justin Hart
I've got a spec written for this that I've been quite lax in finishing. I'll clean it up a bit tonight/tomorrow and send out a draft link for review. -- Justin Hart -- jh...@photobucket.com On Jan 18, 2011, at 4:20 PM, Igor Faynberg wrote: Interesting! I definitely see value

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Underscore, dash, green, blue

2010-07-01 Thread Justin Hart
+1 for underscores except header keys. -- Justin Hart -- jh...@photobucket.com On Jul 1, 2010, at 7:39 AM, Pelle Braendgaard wrote: I already implemented 09 but it was a (very tiny) bit of a hassle to have to convert underscores. So I also agree with 3 except headers On Thu

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Scope :: Was: Extensibility for OAuth?

2010-06-25 Thread Justin Hart
+1 towards space-seperated strings. It seems like every server is going to have diverging requirements on scopes, so anything more will be awfully hard for everyone to agree on. -- Justin Hart -- jh...@photobucket.com On Jun 25, 2010, at 12:14 PM, Eran Hammer-Lahav wrote: I like

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Proposal for single JSON response format

2010-06-10 Thread Justin Hart
+1 for MUST JSON response, MAY form-encoded (and xml, etc etc) response via extension (response_format parameter?) -- Justin Hart -- jh...@photobucket.com On Jun 10, 2010, at 2:29 PM, Eran Hammer-Lahav wrote: After taking a break from our previous debate(s) on the issue of which

Re: [OAUTH-WG] What error codes do you need?

2010-03-22 Thread Justin Hart
Was there early discussion that had much of the work in the ProblemReporting extension included for 2.0? http://wiki.oauth.net/ProblemReporting On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 2:26 PM, Chris Messina chris.mess...@gmail.comwrote: We've had this page on the wiki for some time... perhaps it could be