Re: [OAUTH-WG] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC9449 (7646)

2023-09-18 Thread Brian Campbell
Agree, this errata report looks correct. On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 1:27 AM Daniel Fett wrote: > The erratum looks correct to me. > > -Daniel > Am 18.09.23 um 08:57 schrieb RFC Errata System: > > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC9449, > "OAuth 2.0 Demonstrating Proof of Possess

Re: [OAUTH-WG] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC9449 (7646)

2023-09-18 Thread Daniel Fett
The erratum looks correct to me. -Daniel Am 18.09.23 um 08:57 schrieb RFC Errata System: The following errata report has been submitted for RFC9449, "OAuth 2.0 Demonstrating Proof of Possession (DPoP)". -- You may review the report below and at: https://www.

[OAUTH-WG] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC9449 (7646)

2023-09-17 Thread RFC Errata System
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC9449, "OAuth 2.0 Demonstrating Proof of Possession (DPoP)". -- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7646 -- Type: Editorial Reporte