Agree, this errata report looks correct.
On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 1:27 AM Daniel Fett wrote:
> The erratum looks correct to me.
>
> -Daniel
> Am 18.09.23 um 08:57 schrieb RFC Errata System:
>
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC9449,
> "OAuth 2.0 Demonstrating Proof of Possess
The erratum looks correct to me.
-Daniel
Am 18.09.23 um 08:57 schrieb RFC Errata System:
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC9449,
"OAuth 2.0 Demonstrating Proof of Possession (DPoP)".
--
You may review the report below and at:
https://www.
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC9449,
"OAuth 2.0 Demonstrating Proof of Possession (DPoP)".
--
You may review the report below and at:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7646
--
Type: Editorial
Reporte