Re: [OAUTH-WG] A token review of draft-parecki-oauth-v2-1-01

2020-04-27 Thread Brian Campbell
On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 5:48 PM Aaron Parecki wrote: > Thanks for the detailed review Brian! I've made many of these edits to the > draft, but there are still a few things that need some discussion on the > list. My notes are inline below. > Thanks Aaron. I realize there was a lot there. I've

Re: [OAUTH-WG] A token review of draft-parecki-oauth-v2-1-01

2020-04-24 Thread Aaron Parecki
Thanks for the detailed review Brian! I've made many of these edits to the draft, but there are still a few things that need some discussion on the list. My notes are inline below. On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 3:49 PM Brian Campbell wrote: > Been working on this on and off for a while now (it's not

Re: [OAUTH-WG] A token review of draft-parecki-oauth-v2-1-01

2020-04-24 Thread Brian Campbell
On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 5:36 PM Dick Hardt wrote: > Brian: many, many thanks for all the feedback! > You are welcome. I won't lie - it was not a quick exercise :) > > I did a quick skim of your comments, and will address the first and last > ones. > > On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 3:49 PM Brian

Re: [OAUTH-WG] A token review of draft-parecki-oauth-v2-1-01

2020-04-22 Thread Dick Hardt
Brian: many, many thanks for all the feedback! I did a quick skim of your comments, and will address the first and last ones. On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 3:49 PM Brian Campbell wrote: > Been working on this on and off for a while now (it's not exactly short at > 80+ pages, various other

[OAUTH-WG] A token review of draft-parecki-oauth-v2-1-01

2020-04-21 Thread Brian Campbell
Been working on this on and off for a while now (it's not exactly short at 80+ pages, various other priorities, etc.) but wanted to share my thoughts from an initial review of the OAuth 2.1 draft before the interim next week where it is on the agenda