framework for obtaining an access token.
EHL
From: oauth-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Lisa
Dusseault
Sent: Wednesday, June 02, 2010 10:33 AM
To: oauth
Subject: [OAUTH-WG] Assertion flow and token bootstrapping
I've been trying to understand the use case
[mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
Dick Hardt
Sent: Friday, June 04, 2010 9:59 PM
To: Luke Shepard
Cc: oauth@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Assertion flow and token bootstrapping
because we use it
On 2010-06-04, at 6:40 PM, Luke Shepard wrote:
Why?
On Jun 4, 2010, at 4:41 PM
/
__
-Original Message-
From: oauth-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
Dick Hardt
Sent: Friday, June 04, 2010 9:59 PM
To: Luke Shepard
Cc: oauth@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Assertion flow and token bootstrapping
because we use it
On 2010-06-04, at 6
[mailto:dick.ha...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, June 06, 2010 8:10 PM
To: Thomas Hardjono
Cc: oauth@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Assertion flow and token bootstrapping
I hope so.
On 2010-06-06, at 3:22 PM, Thomas Hardjono wrote:
Apologies for another newbie question: is the design-intention
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 9:20 AM, Peter Saint-Andre stpe...@stpeter.im wrote:
At least for the assertion flow, that's definitely true. At the interim
meeting we had some discussion about perhaps pulling the assertion flow
out of the base spec and into a separate document. Perhaps that's the
+1
Am 04.06.2010 23:38, schrieb Brian Campbell:
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 9:20 AM, Peter Saint-Andrestpe...@stpeter.im wrote:
At least for the assertion flow, that's definitely true. At the interim
meeting we had some discussion about perhaps pulling the assertion flow
out of the base spec
+1
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 4, 2010, at 5:38 PM, Brian Campbell
bcampb...@pingidentity.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 9:20 AM, Peter Saint-Andre
stpe...@stpeter.im wrote:
At least for the assertion flow, that's definitely true. At the
interim
meeting we had some discussion about
Why?
On Jun 4, 2010, at 4:41 PM, Patrick Harding wrote:
+1
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 4, 2010, at 5:38 PM, Brian Campbell
bcampb...@pingidentity.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 9:20 AM, Peter Saint-Andre
stpe...@stpeter.im wrote:
At least for the assertion flow, that's
because we use it
On 2010-06-04, at 6:40 PM, Luke Shepard wrote:
Why?
On Jun 4, 2010, at 4:41 PM, Patrick Harding wrote:
+1
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 4, 2010, at 5:38 PM, Brian Campbell
bcampb...@pingidentity.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 9:20 AM, Peter Saint-Andre
On 6/3/10 8:54 AM, Thomas Hardjono wrote:
PS. Compared to the details of RFC4120 and even
to the old ISAKMP in the IETF, the current
OAuth2.0 draft-05 spec appear to be a high-level framework
that needs to be instantiated/profiled.
At least for the assertion flow, that's definitely true. At
that needs to be instantiated/profiled.
/thomas/
__
-From: Dick Hardt [mailto:dick.ha...@gmail.com]
-Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2010 1:51 AM
To: Brian Campbell
Cc: Thomas Hardjono; oauth
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Assertion flow and token bootstrapping
On 2010-06-03, at 7:54 AM, Thomas Hardjono wrote:
Dick, Brian,
Thanks for the clarification.
- Is the Assertion Flow designed only for the STS,
or can it be used with other identity providers (non-WSS).
It can be used with any tokens. I use the STS term to clarify the design
pattern.
On 2010-06-03, at 8:20 AM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
On 6/3/10 8:54 AM, Thomas Hardjono wrote:
PS. Compared to the details of RFC4120 and even
to the old ISAKMP in the IETF, the current
OAuth2.0 draft-05 spec appear to be a high-level framework
that needs to be instantiated/profiled.
At
I've been trying to understand the use case for the assertion flow (
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-v2-05#section-3.10) .
Conversely, I have a use case for bootstrapping, and I'm trying to
understand if the assertion flow is the right flow for that use case.
The bootstrapping use
...@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Lisa
Dusseault
Sent: Wednesday, June 02, 2010 1:33 PM
To: oauth
Subject: [OAUTH-WG] Assertion flow and token bootstrapping
I've been trying to understand the use case for the assertion flow
(http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-v2-05
[mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
Lisa Dusseault
Sent: Wednesday, June 02, 2010 1:33 PM
To: oauth
Subject: [OAUTH-WG] Assertion flow and token bootstrapping
I've been trying to understand the use case for the assertion flow
(http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-v2-05
, June 02, 2010 1:33 PM
To: oauth
Subject: [OAUTH-WG] Assertion flow and token bootstrapping
I've been trying to understand the use case for the assertion flow
(http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-v2-05#section-3.10) .
Conversely, I have a use case for bootstrapping, and I'm
17 matches
Mail list logo
