Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Adoption - AS Issuer Identifier in Authorization Response

All, Based on the feedback during the last interim meeting and on this list below, the WG has decided to adopt this draft as a WG document. Authors, When you have a chance, feel free to submit a new WG document. Regards, Rifaat & Hannes On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 5:02 AM Dominick Baier

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Adoption - AS Issuer Identifier in Authorization Response

+1 ——— Dominick Baier On 8. December 2020 at 13:51:04, Rifaat Shekh-Yusef (rifaat.s.i...@gmail.com) wrote: All, This is a call for adoption for the following AS Issuer Identifier in Authorization Response as a WG document:

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Adoption - AS Issuer Identifier in Authorization Response

Whaybdo I keep getting these messages and how did you hack my email Get Outlook for iOS From: OAuth on behalf of Warren Parad Sent: Wednesday, December 9, 2020 8:34:53 AM To: Karsten Meyer zu Selhausen Cc: oauth Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG]

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Adoption - AS Issuer Identifier in Authorization Response

Hi Warren, Am 08.12.20 um 20:15 schrieb Warren Parad: > As an implementer on both sides of the issue I'm struggling to > understand how this problem would occur. I'm finding issues with the > proposed problems: > > 1. Honest AS is compromised, assuming this does happen details on why >

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Adoption - AS Issuer Identifier in Authorization Response

As an implementer on both sides of the issue I'm struggling to understand how this problem would occur. I'm finding issues with the proposed problems: 1. Honest AS is compromised, assuming this does happen details on why adding iss to the AS response would prevent attacks is necessary for

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Adoption - AS Issuer Identifier in Authorization Response

+1 ᐧ On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 4:51 AM Rifaat Shekh-Yusef wrote: > All, > > This is a call for adoption for the following AS Issuer Identifier in > Authorization Response as a WG document: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-meyerzuselhausen-oauth-iss-auth-resp/ > > Please, provide your

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Adoption - AS Issuer Identifier in Authorization Response

Support with both hands! Vladimir On 08/12/2020 14:50, Rifaat Shekh-Yusef wrote: > All, > > This is a call for adoption for the following AS Issuer Identifier in > Authorization Response as a WG document: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-meyerzuselhausen-oauth-iss-auth-resp/ > > Please,

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Adoption - AS Issuer Identifier in Authorization Response

I support adoption On Tue, 8 Dec 2020 at 13:51, Rifaat Shekh-Yusef wrote: > All, > > This is a call for adoption for the following AS Issuer Identifier in > Authorization Response as a WG document: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-meyerzuselhausen-oauth-iss-auth-resp/ > > Please,

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Adoption - AS Issuer Identifier in Authorization Response

support adoption On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 5:51 AM Rifaat Shekh-Yusef wrote: > All, > > This is a call for adoption for the following AS Issuer Identifier in > Authorization Response as a WG document: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-meyerzuselhausen-oauth-iss-auth-resp/ > > Please,

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Adoption - AS Issuer Identifier in Authorization Response

+1 On 08.12.2020 13:50, Rifaat Shekh-Yusef wrote: All, This is a call for adoption for the following AS Issuer Identifier in Authorization Response as a WG document: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-meyerzuselhausen-oauth-iss-auth-resp/

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Adoption - AS Issuer Identifier in Authorization Response

+1. I've implemented the specification. I think that the current draft is already good enough for implementers. Thank you, authors. Taka On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 9:50 PM Rifaat Shekh-Yusef wrote: > All, > > This is a call for adoption for the following AS Issuer Identifier in > Authorization

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Adoption - AS Issuer Identifier in Authorization Response

Obviously, +1. Am 08.12.20 um 13:50 schrieb Rifaat Shekh-Yusef: > All, > > This is a call for adoption for the following AS Issuer Identifier in > Authorization Response as a WG document: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-meyerzuselhausen-oauth-iss-auth-resp/ > > Please, provide your

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Adoption - AS Issuer Identifier in Authorization Response

I support the WG adoption of this draft. > Am 08.12.2020 um 13:50 schrieb Rifaat Shekh-Yusef : > > All, > > This is a call for adoption for the following AS Issuer Identifier in > Authorization Response as a WG document: >

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Adoption - AS Issuer Identifier in Authorization Response

I support adoption of this draft. > On 8 Dec 2020, at 12:50, Rifaat Shekh-Yusef wrote: > > All, > > This is a call for adoption for the following AS Issuer Identifier in > Authorization Response as a WG document: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-meyerzuselhausen-oauth-iss-auth-resp/

[OAUTH-WG] Call for Adoption - AS Issuer Identifier in Authorization Response

All, This is a call for adoption for the following AS Issuer Identifier in Authorization Response as a WG document: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-meyerzuselhausen-oauth-iss-auth-resp/ Please, provide your feedback on the mailing list by Dec 22nd. Regards, Rifaat & Hannes