Part if the lack of consensus is lack of agreement on what mgmt is for. Until
that is resolved its hard to see what the timeline would be. Mgmt might be the
right call. Who knows.
For example i see credential rotation and client software update, and
deprovisioning as being events. I am not sur
Hi Brian, Hi Justin,
thanks for the quick feedback.
Here is the status from the last meeting:
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth/current/msg12514.html
I tried to put a date to the milestone on the charter page.
When would this work be finished?
Ciao
Hannes
On 07/03/2014 04:58 AM, Bria
Having difficulty finding consensus around a solution isn’t the same
thing as lack of interest in a solution. I think it would be very
premature to remove the Dynamic Client Registration Management
Protocol from the list of WG items.
On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 8:06 AM, Hannes Tschofenig
wrote:
>
> *
