Re: [OAUTH-WG] Francesca Palombini's No Objection on draft-ietf-oauth-rar-18: (with COMMENT)

2022-12-13 Thread Francesca Palombini
Hi Justin, Brian, Thank you for your answers! It makes sense not include it if you believe it would confuse the readers, just thought I would point it out in case you had not seen it. Francesca From: Justin Richer Date: Monday, 12 December 2022 at 19:48 To: Brian Campbell Cc: Francesca Palom

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Francesca Palombini's No Objection on draft-ietf-oauth-rar-18: (with COMMENT)

2022-12-12 Thread Justin Richer
Apologies, sending from the correct email account this time. Please do not reply to the other address. Thank you, — Justin On Dec 12, 2022, at 1:45 PM, Justin Richer mailto:jus...@richer.org>> wrote: Francesca, Thanks for the pointer! I read through the referenced RFC as well and I agree wi

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Francesca Palombini's No Objection on draft-ietf-oauth-rar-18: (with COMMENT)

2022-12-12 Thread Brian Campbell
Thanks Francesca, I must admit that I was not aware of RFC9237. After a quick look, however, it really is intended for Ace and IoT (as you point out) and I don't believe I could write anything sufficiently meaningful about any similarities to this document to warrant inclusion. On Mon, Dec 12, 20

[OAUTH-WG] Francesca Palombini's No Objection on draft-ietf-oauth-rar-18: (with COMMENT)

2022-12-12 Thread Francesca Palombini via Datatracker
Francesca Palombini has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-oauth-rar-18: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to