On 5/1/12 5:04 PM, Mike Jones wrote:
> I’m editing the JWT spec to prepare for the OAuth WG version and to
> track changes in the JOSE specs. Currently the “typ” values defined for
> JWT tokens are “JWT” and “http://openid.net/specs/jwt/1.0” (see
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jones-json-web-t
ll [mailto:bcampb...@pingidentity.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2012 4:26 PM
> To: Mike Jones
> Cc: oauth@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Proposed URN for JWT token type:
> urn:ietf:params:oauth:token-type:jwt
>
> The only concern I might raise with it is that use of the "
tity.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2012 4:26 PM
To: Mike Jones
Cc: oauth@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Proposed URN for JWT token type:
urn:ietf:params:oauth:token-type:jwt
The only concern I might raise with it is that use of the "token-type"
part might lead to some confusion. Th
The only concern I might raise with it is that use of the "token-type"
part might lead to some confusion. The term token type and the
parameter token_type are already pretty loaded and have specific
meaning from the core OAuth framework:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-v2-26#section-7.1
I'm editing the JWT spec to prepare for the OAuth WG version and to track
changes in the JOSE specs. Currently the "typ" values defined for JWT tokens
are "JWT" and "http://openid.net/specs/jwt/1.0"; (see
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jones-json-web-token-08#section-5). I believe
that the
