Re: [OAUTH-WG] SAML Assertion Draft Items [Item 1: client auth]

2011-07-10 Thread Brian Campbell
Campbell [mailto:bcampb...@pingidentity.com] >> Sent: Saturday, July 09, 2011 5:53 AM >> To: Eran Hammer-Lahav >> Cc: oauth >> Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] SAML Assertion Draft Items [Item 1: client auth] >> >> Thanks for the response, Eran. I'm breaking this thread up i

Re: [OAUTH-WG] SAML Assertion Draft Items [Item 2: URI(s)]

2011-07-09 Thread Mike Jones
.@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Brian Campbell Sent: Saturday, July 09, 2011 6:15 AM To: Eran Hammer-Lahav Cc: oauth Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] SAML Assertion Draft Items [Item 2: URI(s)] Discussion on the other item, the grant_type URI, inline below. This whole thing seems like it sh

Re: [OAUTH-WG] SAML Assertion Draft Items [Item 2: URI(s)]

2011-07-09 Thread Eran Hammer-Lahav
> -Original Message- > From: Brian Campbell [mailto:bcampb...@pingidentity.com] > Sent: Saturday, July 09, 2011 6:15 AM > To: Eran Hammer-Lahav > Cc: oauth > Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] SAML Assertion Draft Items [Item 2: URI(s)] > > Discussion on the other item, th

Re: [OAUTH-WG] SAML Assertion Draft Items [Item 1: client auth]

2011-07-09 Thread Eran Hammer-Lahav
Sounds reasonable. Can you provide a schedule outline? EHL > -Original Message- > From: Brian Campbell [mailto:bcampb...@pingidentity.com] > Sent: Saturday, July 09, 2011 5:53 AM > To: Eran Hammer-Lahav > Cc: oauth > Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] SAML Assertion Draft Items [I

Re: [OAUTH-WG] SAML Assertion Draft Items [Item 2: URI(s)]

2011-07-09 Thread Brian Campbell
Discussion on the other item, the grant_type URI, inline below. This whole thing seems like it shouldn't be an issue at all as there's no functionality involved. But I've been hung up on it for a while and the spec needs some URI. I could *really* use the advice of the AD and/or Chairs on this.

Re: [OAUTH-WG] SAML Assertion Draft Items [Item 1: client auth]

2011-07-09 Thread Brian Campbell
Thanks for the response, Eran. I'm breaking this thread up into the distinct issues. Reply inline below to the first item about client auth. On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 11:24 PM, Eran Hammer-Lahav wrote: > > > However, the SAML draft does not currently cover SAML for client > > authentication and pro

Re: [OAUTH-WG] SAML Assertion Draft Items

2011-07-07 Thread Eran Hammer-Lahav
> -Original Message- > From: oauth-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf > Of Brian Campbell > Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2011 12:06 PM > To: oauth > Subject: [OAUTH-WG] SAML Assertion Draft Items > > WG, > > Unfortunately I will not b

[OAUTH-WG] SAML Assertion Draft Items

2011-07-07 Thread Brian Campbell
WG, Unfortunately I will not be at IETF#81 and will probably not be able to post a new draft of draft-ietf-oauth-saml2-bearer prior to the I-D submission cutoff date. In lieu of that, I'd like to make a few proposals and/or ask a few questions regarding the next draft in hopes of fostering some p