Re: [OAUTH-WG] Section 7.2

2012-06-18 Thread Eran Hammer
Cc: Hannes Tschofenig; Eran Hammer; oauth@ietf.org WG (oauth@ietf.org) Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Section 7.2 Hi Mike, this text below does not prohibit error information to be sent back to the client (otherwise there would be a MUST NOT). So, if a developer reads this below then when

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Section 7.2

2012-06-16 Thread Mike Jones
...@hueniverse.com] Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2012 11:32 PM To: Mike Jones; oauth@ietf.org WG (oauth@ietf.org) Subject: RE: [OAUTH-WG] Section 7.2 WFM. This will be the new text for 7.2 unless someone has any additional feedback or concerns. This closes my issue with the new error registry changes. EH From

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Section 7.2

2012-06-16 Thread Eran Hammer
I would rather these restrictions be in the error registry section below and add a forward reference from 7.2. EH From: Mike Jones [mailto:michael.jo...@microsoft.com] Sent: Saturday, June 16, 2012 12:17 PM To: Eran Hammer; oauth@ietf.org WG (oauth@ietf.org) Subject: RE: [OAUTH-WG] Section 7.2

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Section 7.2

2012-06-16 Thread Mike Jones
OK - will do. From: Eran Hammer Sent: 6/16/2012 12:43 PM To: Mike Jones; oauth@ietf.org WG (oauth@ietf.org) Subject: RE: [OAUTH-WG] Section 7.2 I would rather these restrictions be in the error registry section below and add a forward reference from 7.2. EH