Finally, we added PKCE S256 support on our implementation.
Best,
Nat
2015年2月20日(金)、7:28 Brian Campbell bcampb...@pingidentity.com:
I can't comment with any authority on product road-map (that's above my
pay-grade) but I can speculate that we probably would support S256
eventually.
On Wed,
I can't comment with any authority on product road-map (that's above my
pay-grade) but I can speculate that we probably would support S256
eventually.
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 10:33 AM, Hannes Tschofenig
hannes.tschofe...@gmx.net wrote:
Thanks Brian for pointing me to Section 4.4.1 and to the
It was Google that wanted S256 to be mandatory for the AS to support. That
makes it easier for the client.
S256 is relatively new so not being supported yet is not surprising.
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 18, 2015, at 12:15 PM, Torsten Lodderstedt tors...@lodderstedt.net
wrote:
We don't
Hi Hannes,
our implementation supports the plain mode only. We just verified
compliance of our implementation with the current spec. As the only
deviation, we do not enforce the minimum length of 43 characters of the
code verifier.
kind regards,
Torsten.
Am 17.02.2015 17:48, schrieb Hannes
Thanks for the info, Torsten.
Your feedback raises an interesting question, namely what functionality
the parties have to implement to claim conformance to the specification.
Quickly scanning through the specification didn't tell me whether it is
OK to just implement the plain mode or whether
Hi Torsten,
does this mean that your implementation is not compliant with the
current version anymore or that you haven't had time to verify whether
there are differences to the earlier version?
Ciao
Hannes
On 01/31/2015 05:34 PM, Torsten Lodderstedt wrote:
Deutsche Telekom also implemented
Hi Brian,
what is different between the version you guys implemented and the
version that is currently documented in the latest version of the draft?
Ciao
Hannes
On 01/30/2015 06:50 PM, Brian Campbell wrote:
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 9:24 AM, Hannes Tschofenig
hannes.tschofe...@gmx.net
Deutsche Telekom also implemented an early version of the draft last year.
Am 30.01.2015 um 18:50 schrieb Brian Campbell bcampb...@pingidentity.com:
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 9:24 AM, Hannes Tschofenig
hannes.tschofe...@gmx.net wrote:
1) What implementations of the spec are you aware
