[OAUTH-WG] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-ietf-oauth-jwt-bearer-10: (with COMMENT)

2014-10-16 Thread Stephen Farrell
Stephen Farrell has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-oauth-jwt-bearer-10: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-ietf-oauth-jwt-bearer-10: (with COMMENT)

2014-10-16 Thread Brian Campbell
A JWT, by it's very definition, is a set of base64url pieces concatenated together with dot . characters (which is also URL safe). So no additional encoding or serialization of the JWT is needed. On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 5:22 AM, Stephen Farrell stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie wrote: Stephen Farrell

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-ietf-oauth-jwt-bearer-10: (with COMMENT)

2014-10-16 Thread Stephen Farrell
Ah fair enough, forgot that. S. On 16/10/14 14:10, Brian Campbell wrote: A JWT, by it's very definition, is a set of base64url pieces concatenated together with dot . characters (which is also URL safe). So no additional encoding or serialization of the JWT is needed. On Thu, Oct 16, 2014