Re: [OAUTH-WG] Token Binding & implicit

2018-11-20 Thread Aaron Parecki
Agreed with 4. Since the security BCP is deprecating the implicit flow, it seems like it's not worth the effort to try to come up with a solution for this when the security implications of doing this aren't clear yet either. Aaron Parecki aaronparecki.com On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 11:36 AM

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Token Binding & implicit

2018-11-20 Thread Torsten Lodderstedt
I opt for (4) - Remove support/description of binding of access tokens issued from the authorization endpoint I think the potential solution we worked out (slide 6) is to complex and the security implications of the redirect via the resource servers are still unclear. > Am 18.11.2018 um

[OAUTH-WG] Token Binding & implicit

2018-11-18 Thread Brian Campbell
During the first OAuth session in Bangkok the question "what to do about token binding & implicit?" was raised. There was some discussion but session time was limited and we had to move on before any real consensus was reached. So I thought I'd bring the question to the WG list to generate some