Re: [OAUTH-WG] Transaction Tokens issuance in the absence of incoming token

ai >> >> >> >> *From: *OAuth on behalf of Dmitry Telegin >> >> *Date: *Friday, 5. April 2024 at 00:41 >> *To: *Atul Tulshibagwale >> *Cc: *oauth >> *Subject: *Re: [OAUTH-WG] Transaction Tokens issuance in the absence of >> inc

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Transaction Tokens issuance in the absence of incoming token

Friday, 5. April 2024 at 00:41 > *To: *Atul Tulshibagwale > *Cc: *oauth > *Subject: *Re: [OAUTH-WG] Transaction Tokens issuance in the absence of > incoming token > > > > Hello Atul, > > > > As an alternative to Token Exchange and separate (new) endpoint, have you

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Transaction Tokens issuance in the absence of incoming token

: Friday, 5. April 2024 at 00:41 To: Atul Tulshibagwale Cc: oauth Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Transaction Tokens issuance in the absence of incoming token Hello Atul, As an alternative to Token Exchange and separate (new) endpoint, have you ever considered OAuth 2.0 Extension Grants<ht

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Transaction Tokens issuance in the absence of incoming token

Hello Atul, As an alternative to Token Exchange and separate (new) endpoint, have you ever considered OAuth 2.0 Extension Grants ? This could give us more flexibility as will let us define our own set of input parameters and validation

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Transaction Tokens issuance in the absence of incoming token

Thanks very much for your feedback, Joe! On Wed, Apr 3, 2024 at 10:16 AM Joseph Salowey wrote: > Hi Atul, > > I'm just starting to review the transaction tokens draft and have only a > minimal understanding of the token exchange document at this point so I'm > lacking a little background, but I

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Transaction Tokens issuance in the absence of incoming token

Hi Atul, I'm just starting to review the transaction tokens draft and have only a minimal understanding of the token exchange document at this point so I'm lacking a little background, but I have a few comments and questions below. On Fri, Mar 29, 2024 at 10:39 AM Atul Tulshibagwale wrote: >

[OAUTH-WG] Transaction Tokens issuance in the absence of incoming token

Hi all, We had a meeting today (notes here ) in which we discussed the question of what we should do if there is no incoming (external) token in the request to issue a Transaction Token