: Re: [OAUTH-WG] draft-ietf-oauth-v2-bearer-08 HTTP syntax comments
On 2011-09-24 02:13, Mike Jones wrote:
Thanks for your comments, Julian. Responses to them, which reflect the
content of draft 09, follow inline.
Thanks!
...
2.1. The Authorization Request Header Field
...@microsoft.com
To: Julian Reschke julian.resc...@gmx.de
Cc: oauth@ietf.org oauth@ietf.org
Sent: Monday, September 26, 2011 12:03 PM
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] draft-ietf-oauth-v2-bearer-08 HTTP syntax comments
Thanks for your note, Julian. Responses follow inline
On 2011-09-26 21:03, Mike Jones wrote:
...
No, b64token isn’t always there; the syntax specifies that either a
b64token OR one or more auth-params will be present. Yes, that’s intended.
OK then; just checking :-)
...
This was the working group decision at the interim meeting and is used
in
On 2011-09-26 22:10, Mike Jones wrote:
Getting rid of the b64token would be an unnecessary breaking change.
...
You're at draft state, right?
If you want to keep b64token *and* be able to use params, then you'll
need an alternate syntax that puts the token into param (which,
arguably, would
On 2011-09-24 02:13, Mike Jones wrote:
Thanks for your comments, Julian. Responses to them, which reflect the
content of draft 09, follow inline.
Thanks!
...
2.1. The Authorization Request Header Field
The Authorization request header field is used by clients to make
authenticated requests
Of Peter
Saint-Andre
Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2011 11:58 AM
To: Julian Reschke
Cc: OAuth WG (oauth@ietf.org)
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] draft-ietf-oauth-v2-bearer-08 HTTP syntax comments
On 8/9/11 6:06 AM, Julian Reschke wrote:
1.1. Notational Conventions
...
This document uses
Reschke
Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2011 5:07 AM
To: OAuth WG (oauth@ietf.org)
Subject: [OAUTH-WG] draft-ietf-oauth-v2-bearer-08 HTTP syntax comments
Hi there,
below a few comments on dependencies to HTTPbis, and the actual header field
syntax.
Best regards,
Julian
-- snip --
1.1
Hi there,
below a few comments on dependencies to HTTPbis, and the actual header
field syntax.
Best regards,
Julian
-- snip --
1.1. Notational Conventions
...
This document uses the Augmented Backus-Naur Form (ABNF) notation of
[I-D.ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging], which is based
On 8/9/11 6:06 AM, Julian Reschke wrote:
1.1. Notational Conventions
...
This document uses the Augmented Backus-Naur Form (ABNF) notation of
[I-D.ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging], which is based upon the Augmented
Backus-Naur Form (ABNF) notation of [RFC5234]. Additionally, the
