Arnott
Sent: Friday, June 04, 2010 5:56 AM
To: OAuth WG (oauth@ietf.org)
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Definition of XML response format
In the absence of anyone else volunteering an XML format, what would you say to
this as a proposal (because the implementation of which happens to be simple
for me
:56 AM
*To:* OAuth WG (oauth@ietf.org)
*Subject:* Re: [OAUTH-WG] Definition of XML response format
In the absence of anyone else volunteering an XML format, what would you
say to this as a proposal (because the implementation of which happens to be
simple for me):
root type=object
] Definition of XML response format
In the absence of anyone else volunteering an XML format, what
would you say to this as a proposal (because the implementation of which
happens to be simple for me):
root type=object
access_token type=stringsome
From: oauth-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
Andrew Arnott
Sent: Friday, June 04, 2010 5:56 AM
To: OAuth WG (oauth@ietf.org)
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Definition of XML response format
In the absence of anyone else volunteering an XML format, what would you say
for now.
EHL
From: oauth-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
Andrew Arnott
Sent: Friday, June 04, 2010 5:56 AM
To: OAuth WG (oauth@ietf.org)
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Definition of XML response format
In the absence of anyone else volunteering an XML format, what
In the absence of anyone else volunteering an XML format, what would you say
to this as a proposal (because the implementation of which happens to be
simple for me):
root type=object
access_token type=stringsome access token/access_token
refresh_token type=stringsome refresh
I don't know if this is helpful or not... but there was a proposed
extension for OAuth 1.0 dealing with encoding OAuth responses in
different body formats... this can be found on the now extinct
oauth-extensions google group.
Thanks, George. From that I get this:
response
oauth_parameter name=oauth_tokentoken/oauth_parameter
oauth_parameter name=oauth_token_secretsecret/oauth_parameter
/response
From the text around it, it sounds like SPs were permitted to add to this
(presumably using their own
I'd personally rather see something flatter, even with an implied root
namespace defined in the spec. Maybe like:
oauth
access_tokenasdfasoij234f/access_token
refresh_token2f098jadfasdfasdf/refresh_token
expires_in300/expires_in
/oauth
Mirroring the key-value format for the
How about keeping it even more flat and compact:
oauth access_token=asdfasoij234f refresh_token=2f098jadfasdfasdf
expires_in=300 /
This also is more simple on the DOM side, just doc.root['access_token'] instead
of traversing or xpath.
Anyway, I think OAuth 2 is better served in general by
)
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Definition of XML response format
Thanks, George. From that I get this:
response
oauth_parameter name=oauth_tokentoken/oauth_parameter
oauth_parameter name=oauth_token_secretsecret/oauth_parameter
/response
From the text around it, it sounds like SPs
11 matches
Mail list logo
