The Ping doc was sent a while back on a different thread about
re-charting: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth/current/msg08607.html
I should probably have my people (aka Paul) submit it as an actual I-D?
On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 8:25 AM, John Bradley wrote:
> There is a Ping document. I
Hi guys,
I was wondering how many of you will be at the upcoming IIW in Mountain View
(or for some other event). IIW will run from Tuesday (May 1st) to Thursday (May
3rd).
I thought it might be good to useful to get together on the Friday after the
IIW event for a OAuth breakfast chat.
I am
Can do.
Sent from my iPad
On 2012-04-16, at 1:55 PM, Hannes Tschofenig wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I was wondering how many of you will be at the upcoming IIW in Mountain View
> (or for some other event). IIW will run from Tuesday (May 1st) to Thursday
> (May 3rd).
>
> I thought it might be go
Dear Michael Jones, Dick Hardt, David Recordon:
An IPR disclosure that pertains to your Internet-Draft entitled "The OAuth 2.0
Authorization Protocol: Bearer Tokens" (draft-ietf-oauth-v2-bearer) was
submitted to the IETF Secretariat on 2012-04-12 and has been posted on the
"IETF Page of Intelle
I am planning to.
-bill
>
> From: Hannes Tschofenig
>To: "oauth@ietf.org WG"
>Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 4:55 AM
>Subject: [OAUTH-WG] IIW and OAuth
>
>Hi guys,
>
>I was wondering how many of you will be at the upcoming IIW in Mountain View
>(or for some
Can do, but would prefer a date Tues-Thurs as am flying home Thurs eve.
Phil
@independentid
www.independentid.com
phil.h...@oracle.com
On 2012-04-16, at 4:55 AM, Hannes Tschofenig wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I was wondering how many of you will be at the upcoming IIW in Mountain View
> (or for
Thursday morning works for me as well.
John B.
Sent from my iPad
On 2012-04-16, at 6:14 PM, Phil Hunt wrote:
> Can do, but would prefer a date Tues-Thurs as am flying home Thurs eve.
>
> Phil
>
> @independentid
> www.independentid.com
> phil.h...@oracle.com
>
>
>
>
>
> On 2012-04-16, at
Thursday would conflict with IIW sessions proper, and we'd prefer a
Friday morning get together.
-- Justin
On 04/16/2012 12:27 PM, John Bradley wrote:
Thursday morning works for me as well.
John B.
Sent from my iPad
On 2012-04-16, at 6:14 PM, Phil Hunt wrote:
Can do, but would prefer a
I'd also prefer something during IIW schedule (tues - thu)
-- Dick
On 2012-04-16, at 9:42 AM, Justin Richer wrote:
Thursday would conflict with IIW sessions proper, and we'd prefer a Friday
morning get together.
-- Justin
On 04/16/2012 12:27 PM, John Bradley wrote:
Thursday morning works f
Same for me. Tues-Thurs works better for me too.
Axel
-Original Message-
From: oauth-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Phil
Hunt
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 6:15 PM
To: Hannes Tschofenig
Cc: oauth@ietf.org WG
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] IIW and OAuth
Can do, but
Justin Richer writes:
> OK, but with SWD and discovery off the table, can this now be
> considered to be within that manageable number instead?
We wanted to keep the # of WG items to approximately 5. Once we finish
some of these items and get them off our plate we could roll new items
onto the
OK, but with SWD and discovery off the table, can this now be
considered to be within that manageable number instead?
We wanted to keep the # of WG items to approximately 5. Once we finish
some of these items and get them off our plate we could roll new items
onto the plate, theoretically.
"Murray S. Kucherawy" writes:
> Thank you Stephen, I think. :-)
>
> So the discussion on apps-discuss now should be focused on which of the two
> should be the basis for forward progress. I've placed both documents in
> "Call for Adoption" state in the datatracker for appsawg.
>From an OAUTH
Eran Hammer writes:
> All I was saying is that it would be better to postpone it until the
> discovery layer, which this draft clearly relies upon, is a bit
> clearer. I would be satisfied with a simple note stating that if the
> discovery work at the APP area isn't complete, the WG may choose to
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 12:07 PM, Derek Atkins wrote:
>
> I think there are two main differerences between webfinger and swd:
>
> a) whole-document vs. individual attributes
> b) a perceived authorization model to control access to said attributes
>
> In particular I feel there are some specific s
I propose that you schedule this session at IIW on Thursday, as that looks like
the time that will garner the greatest participation.
-- Mike
-Original Message-
From: oauth-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
axel.nenn...@telekom
I only purchased the Tuesday for IIW because I am tied up Wednesday and
Thursday is traditionally digital death or something like that.
Tuesday is best if it is going to be during IIW hours. Though I thought Hannes
was suggesting something outside IIW.
John B.
On 2012-04-17, at 12:21 AM, M
17 matches
Mail list logo
