Re: [OAUTH-WG] signatures, v2

2010-07-21 Thread Nat Sakimura
Hi Dirk, Inline: On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 9:22 AM, Dirk Balfanz balf...@google.com wrote: On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 8:20 AM, Torsten Lodderstedt tors...@lodderstedt.net wrote: Hi Dirk, I have some questions concerning your proposal: - As far as I understand, the difference to magic

Re: [OAUTH-WG] signatures, v2

2010-07-21 Thread Nat Sakimura
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 5:26 PM, Nat Sakimura sakim...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Dirk, Inline: On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 9:22 AM, Dirk Balfanz balf...@google.com wrote: On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 8:20 AM, Torsten Lodderstedt tors...@lodderstedt.net wrote: Hi Dirk, I have some questions

Re: [OAUTH-WG] user-agent flow needs a rewrite

2010-07-21 Thread Bouiaw
Could you explain how the token fragment is removed between step C and D in the user agent profile ? I don't understand how the http redirect request can be modified by the user agent On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 7:58 AM, Naitik Shah n...@daaku.org wrote: Thanks! That sounds great. On Tue, Jul

[OAUTH-WG] OAuth Meeting Agenda

2010-07-21 Thread Hannes Tschofenig
Hi all, please find the latest agenda at: http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/78/agenda/oauth.txt Make sure that you read to provide input during the meeting: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-oauth-v2/ Ciao Hannes Blaine ___ OAuth mailing

Re: [OAUTH-WG] signatures, v2

2010-07-21 Thread Ben Laurie
On 16 July 2010 01:43, Dirk Balfanz balf...@google.com wrote: Hi guys, after reading through the feedback, we did a pass over the OAuth signature proposals. As a reminder, there are three documents: - a document (called JSON Tokens) that just explains how to sign something and verify the

Re: [OAUTH-WG] draft-hardjono-oauth-kerberos-00.txt

2010-07-21 Thread Peter Saint-Andre
Thomas, thanks for writing this draft. I finally got a chance to read it this morning and it is quite helpful and relevant. Do you plan to update it at some point in the light of more recent versions of the core draft? On 6/9/10 1:17 PM, Thomas Hardjono wrote: I was prompted to write this

Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth Meeting Agenda

2010-07-21 Thread David Recordon
What is the rechartering discussion? Thanks, --David On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 3:18 AM, Hannes Tschofenig hannes.tschofe...@gmx.net wrote: Hi all, please find the latest agenda at: http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/78/agenda/oauth.txt Make sure that you read to provide input during the

Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth Meeting Agenda

2010-07-21 Thread Peter Saint-Andre
On 7/21/10 11:58 AM, David Recordon wrote: What is the rechartering discussion? Our charter says we're working on OAuth 1.1. Clearly that is not the case. Aligning the charter with reality might be a good idea. :) Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/

Re: [OAUTH-WG] signatures, v2

2010-07-21 Thread Nat Sakimura
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 8:27 PM, Ben Laurie b...@google.com wrote: On 16 July 2010 01:43, Dirk Balfanz balf...@google.com wrote: Hi guys, after reading through the feedback, we did a pass over the OAuth signature proposals. As a reminder, there are three documents: - a document (called JSON