Re: [OAUTH-WG] WGLC for Step-up Authentication

2022-10-25 Thread Jaimandeep Singh
Dear Warren, It is always nice to read your elaborately written views. It helps in getting perspective. I have a slightly different take on the subject. What is the client application going to do with the "acr_values"? Ultimately, it is going to send these values to the authorization server in

[OAUTH-WG] Security Topics | Incorporate in-browser communication security considerations | PR53

2022-10-25 Thread Christian Mainka
Hi, we would like to request the inclusion of _in-browser communication security considerations_ in the OAuth security topics. We found that in-browser communications like the postMessage API is widely used by Clients and Authorization Servers as an alternative to the standardized HTTP

Re: [OAUTH-WG] WGLC for Step-up Authentication

2022-10-25 Thread Warren Parad
I'm glad that we can move on from item No 1. Regarding this second one, the AS is not required to be involved in this communication, as the RS already has the capability to convey to the user agent why the access token is denied. It just hasn't been standardized. There are lot's of reasons why an

Re: [OAUTH-WG] WGLC for Step-up Authentication

2022-10-25 Thread Jaimandeep Singh
Dear Warren, Brian and Vittorio, My concerns regarding the additional complexity are well addressed by Warren. I am reproducing the same for sake of records in the email archive. > I'd love to see a situation where it is a better at the gateway level. The > problem is that, even if you could, you

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Draft Proposal for a Cross Device Flow Security BCP

2022-10-25 Thread Joseph Heenan
Hi Pieter / Daniel / Filip It’s great to see this document moving forward. I may have missed it, but it may be worth being move explicit that one solution is to avoid using cross-device flows for same-device scenarios? It’s sort of obvious, but questions like “well CIBA works for both