Hi!
I performed an AD review on draft-ietf-oauth-dpop-11. Thanks for this
document. Comments below.
** The document has 6 listed authors. Could this rationale for this be
explained on the list and captured in the shepherd write-up.
** Section 2.
(CRIME,
BREACH, Heartbleed, and the
The IESG has received a request from the Web Authorization Protocol WG
(oauth) to consider the following document: - 'OAuth 2.0 Rich Authorization
Requests'
as Proposed Standard
The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final
comments on this action. Please send
Thank you, Roman — I put together a PR with those changes here:
https://github.com/oauthstuff/draft-oauth-rar/pull/89
— Justin
> On Oct 27, 2022, at 1:51 PM, Roman Danyliw wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> I appreciate the updated in -13 and -14. Most of the AD feedback has been
> addressed there.
Hi!
I appreciate the updated in -13 and -14. Most of the AD feedback has been
addressed there. Combing through the multiple sub-threads, I've pruned to text
to cover what is the residual feedback. See below.
To keep this document moving, I'm going to start IETF LC on it. Please address
Thanks Bjorn, I have opened an issue and the fix will be in the next update.
Much appreciated!
From: Hjelm, Bjorn
Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2022 4:25 AM
To: Pieter Kasselman ; Daniel Fett
; Filip Skokan
Cc: oauth@ietf.org; Joseph Heenan
Subject: Re: [E] Re: [OAUTH-WG] Draft Proposal for a
Hi,
glad to hear that you like our work.
If you have any questions or if we can do anything to help you with
this, don't hesitate to ask.
Best regards
Christian
On 26.10.22 17:13, Donna Chong Nee wrote:
Hi, thanks so much. Will take my time amending this with some help.
Smart E11
On
