Re: [OAUTH-WG] [oauth-ext-review] [IANA #1216704] Expert Review for draft-ietf-oauth-iss-auth-resp (oauth-parameters) (2)

2022-01-26 Thread Hannes Tschofenig
Hi Amanda,   I reviewed the draft and the IANA consideratoin section. The changes are good. I approve the question   Ciao Hannes   PS: I would like to change my contact details from hannes.tschofe...@gmx.net to hannes.tschofe...@arm.com because I irregularly check my GMX account these days.

Re: [OAUTH-WG] [oauth-ext-review] [IANA #1216704] Expert Review for draft-ietf-oauth-iss-auth-resp (oauth-parameters) (2)

2022-01-13 Thread Brian Campbell
Indeed, I believe that is exactly what the registration request in the draft asks to do https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-oauth-iss-auth-resp-05.html#name-oauth-parameters-registrati 5.2. OAuth Parameters Registration This specification updates the "iss" entry in the IANA "OAuth

Re: [OAUTH-WG] [oauth-ext-review] [IANA #1216704] Expert Review for draft-ietf-oauth-iss-auth-resp (oauth-parameters) (2)

2022-01-12 Thread Mike Jones
Note that the requested OAuth parameter to be registered "iss" has already been registered by RFC 9101 (The OAuth 2.0 Authorization Framework: JWT-Secured Authorization Request (JAR)) for Parameter Usage Location "authorization request". Fortunately, this use is compatible with that in

Re: [OAUTH-WG] [oauth-ext-review] [IANA #1216704] Expert Review for draft-ietf-oauth-iss-auth-resp (oauth-parameters) (2)

2021-12-03 Thread Brian Campbell
Note that IESG review resulted in a small update to the registration request text: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-oauth-iss-auth-resp-04#section-5.2 and https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth/_TGNv0-yBhS6VdAkzQ93ZHxbQRc/ On Fri, Dec 3, 2021 at 2:14 PM Michelle Cotton via RT