Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Adoption: Reciprocal OAuth

As the author, I support the adoption. Do we have consensus now? On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 1:18 PM, William Denniss wrote: > +1, I support the adoption of this document. > > I've encountered this problem in the wild for account linking scenarios, > and I think it would be

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Adoption: Reciprocal OAuth

I support the adoption of *Reciprocal OAuth* as a WG document. -- Annabelle Richard Backman Amazon – Identity Services On 4/16/18, 8:20 AM, "OAuth on behalf of Hannes Tschofenig" wrote: Hi all, we had gotten

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Adoption: Reciprocal OAuth

I support the adoption of *Reciprocal OAuth* as a WG document On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 5:19 PM, Hannes Tschofenig < hannes.tschofe...@arm.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > we had gotten positive feedback from the group on Reciprocal OAuth at the > virtual interim meeting earlier this year and also at the

[OAUTH-WG] Call for Adoption: Reciprocal OAuth

Hi all, we had gotten positive feedback from the group on Reciprocal OAuth at the virtual interim meeting earlier this year and also at the London IETF meeting. We would therefore like to get a final confirmation on the mailing list for the adoption of the *Reciprocal OAuth* as a WG document