Re: [Obm] Storage type for big system

2010-06-07 Par sujet Paweł Tęcza
Anthony Prades pisze: > Paweł Tęcza wrote: >> Hi Pierre, >> >> Thank you very much for your response! >> >> Do you use SAN storage for LinAgora services? If so, could you please >> write more about your hardware and architecture? Is it iSCSI-based or >> FC? I hope it's not secret ;) >> > > Hi, we

Re: [Obm] Storage type for big system

2010-06-03 Par sujet Anthony Prades
Paweł Tęcza wrote: > Dnia 2010-06-02, śro o godzinie 17:57 +0200, BAUDRACCO Pierre pisze: >> SAN is recommended. >> NFS is to be banned > > Hi Pierre, > > Thank you very much for your response! > > Do you use SAN storage for LinAgora services? If so, could you please > write more about your hardwar

Re: [Obm] Storage type for big system

2010-06-03 Par sujet Paweł Tęcza
Dnia 2010-06-02, śro o godzinie 17:57 +0200, BAUDRACCO Pierre pisze: > SAN is recommended. > NFS is to be banned Hi Pierre, Thank you very much for your response! Do you use SAN storage for LinAgora services? If so, could you please write more about your hardware and architecture? Is it iSCSI-ba

Re: [Obm] Storage type for big system

2010-06-02 Par sujet BAUDRACCO Pierre
SAN is recommended. NFS is to be banned Paweł Tęcza a écrit : > Hi Folks! > I have yet another question today :) What storage type should I use for > really big and distributed OBM mail system? SAN? NAS? Something else? Do > you have any case study for that? Any comments will be very welcomed :) >