Bulls Will Have Their Day

The next age of equities is coming.
By Barton Biggs | NEWSWEEK
Published Jul 11, 2009
>From the magazine issue dated Jul 20, 2009

At a recent dinner this writer attended with the glitterati of some of the 
world's major investment institutions, about half the group believed that over 
the next couple of years stock markets would set new lows below those of early 
March. Almost everyone agreed it would be a long time before a new global bull 
market emerged in the U.S. or the rest of the world. Instead, markets would 
trade within a broad, painfully low range similar to the one that prevailed 
from 1966 to 1982, when the Dow Jones Industrial Average wandered aimlessly 
between 500 and 1000. Considering all the financial and economic problems the 
world faces, it's hard to disagree, but I do.

As the wine flowed and tongues flapped, a consensus emerged that economic 
growth in the developed economies would be a paltry 1 to 2 percent a year and 
that the annual returns from stocks in the U.S., Europe, and Japan over the 
next five years would be in the mid–single digits at best. There were some who 
argued that the emerging markets would provide faster growth and richer 
returns—perhaps around 10 percent per year—but the skeptics maintained this was 
unrealistic if the S&P 500 delivers only 4 percent to 6 percent. Too many of 
the developing economies are too dependent on exports to the big developed 
economies.

But there is another forecast worth considering, though it might sound 
Pollyanna-ish. It goes like this. The major stock markets around the world have 
just been through one of the most dismal 5-, 10-, and 20-year periods in 
history, both compared to bonds and also in real (inflation-adjusted) terms. 
Let's take the U.S. as an example. For the past five years, through the end of 
the first quarter of 2009, the 10-year Treasury bond had a total return of 6.2 
percent a year, while the S&P 500 declined by 4.8 percent a year. For the last 
10 years, the returns are also drastically in favor of bonds, which are up 6.8 
percent, while stocks are down 3 percent. Bonds have now beaten stocks for 20 
and 30 years, too.

The rewards have been poison for stocks, worldwide. In most major markets, 
equities have had negative real or inflation-adjusted returns for the past 10 
years. In the U.S. the S&P 500, adjusted for inflation, is down more than 50 
percent from the level of 10 years ago, and even more from the highs of 2000. 
By contrast, bonds have had a small, positive real return over the past decade.

In other words, it has been much better over the past three decades to be a 
lender rather than an owner! This is not the way the world is supposed to work. 
Entrepreneurial capitalism cannot continue if it does. Way back in 1831, Alexis 
de Tocqueville wrote that what made America great was its democratic 
institutions and the entrepreneurial spirit of its people. The rewards to the 
high-quality fixed-income investor cannot indefinitely exceed those earned by 
the risk-taking owner. Equity investing is the wellspring of economic growth, 
and in the long run, it has to generate positive real returns and real returns 
that are significantly higher than those of bonds. Indeed, in the U.S. over the 
20th century, stocks had a real return of 6.9 percent a year versus 1.5 percent 
for bonds.

The same relationship is true in other countries. Over the long run, stocks in 
the U.K., Canada, and most European countries also have returned around 5 
percent a year more than Treasury bonds, and in Australia, Germany, and Japan, 
the -premium earned over bonds has been around 7 percent. For raw returns, the 
three best stock markets in the 20th -century were Sweden, Australia, and the 
U.S., in that order.

When stocks do poorly versus bonds and inflation, it has always been a great 
buying opportunity. It has only happened twice before in America: in the second 
quarter of 1932, and the third quarter of 1949. Things looked pretty grim back 
then, too—in Q2 of 1932, you had the Depression, financial scandals, and the 
rise of Hilter. In 1949, investors expected a postwar slump, tax rates were 
sky-high, and communism loomed on the horizon. In both cases, the next five 
years saw a violent bull market in the S&P 500, which outperformed bonds by 
more than 20 percent. The lesson of history is clear. The world has just seen 
one of the greatest bull markets in government bonds ever, accompanied by 
massive leveraging of the financial system and the bursting of the technology 
and housing bubbles, climaxing in the most severe recession since the 1930s. A 
brutal bear market has left stocks cheap in Europe and Japan, slightly 
undervalued in the U.S., and fairly priced in emerging markets. Now, heavy 
stimulus programs will result, inevitably, in higher inflation, which will 
crush government bond prices. All of this means that over the next five years 
stocks are the place to be. It's good to be an owner again. Remember buy low 
(stocks), sell high (bonds).


Kirim email ke