RE: [obsnw] Fibre solution for Observatory

2017-09-28 Thread Annemarie du Bois
From: obsnw@googlegroups.com [mailto:obsnw@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Simon Rhodes Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2017 10:42 PM To: Piers Cc: The Observatory Neighbourhood Watch Subject: Re: [obsnw] Fibre solution for Observatory I have to concur, I received a link saying activate your accoun

Re: [obsnw] Fibre solution for Observatory

2017-09-27 Thread Simon Rhodes
I have to concur, I received a link saying activate your account here which led to 'this page cannot be found'. I had the same enquiry regarding mweb and have received no further correspondence! For the moment also sticking to the 10meg which fades to 2 at best when the wind blows and it gets

Re: [obsnw] Fibre solution for Observatory

2017-06-28 Thread Mark Neville
Hi Colin, You ask about the potential capacity limitations of a PON. As you can see at, for example http://www.sopto.com/blog/the-advantages-and-disadvantages-of-pon-technology/ "... they have less range than an active optical network, meaning subscribers must be geographically closer to the

Re: [obsnw] Fibre solution for Observatory

2017-06-28 Thread Colin Theobald
Thank you so much for your detailed responses Mark. Hugely appreciated. The obvious advantage of overhead fibre is that it will be much faster (and cheaper) to implement than trenching. However, the capacity limitation of the PON network you mention is concerning. But I suppose as long as

[obsnw] Fibre solution for Observatory

2017-06-27 Thread Colin Theobald
I've been trying to get a fibre provider interest in our area for nearly five years. Finally we seem to have some traction with Vumatel. They have begun a proper feasibility study for our area, but 30% of the households need to show interest. The other option would be Openserve (Telkom) but