Re: [Ocfs2-devel] RFC: OCFS2 heartbeat improvements

2012-08-23 Thread Sunil Mushran
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 9:01 PM, Jie Liu jeff@oracle.com wrote: BTW, Sunil mentioned there already has an IO priority patch set but not yet merged. However, I only searched an old posts back to 2006 at: http://www.digipedia.pl/usenet/thread/11947/7120/ Am I missing something? No, I

Re: [Ocfs2-devel] RFC: OCFS2 heartbeat improvements

2012-08-23 Thread Sunil Mushran
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 8:44 PM, Tao Ma t...@tao.ma wrote: I guess the final solution will be WRITE_FUA, and I see btrfs uses it to write out the superblock. It will be handled differently by the underlying block layer so that it will not be in the elevator queue. It should work but I am not

Re: [Ocfs2-devel] RFC: OCFS2 heartbeat improvements

2012-08-23 Thread Tao Ma
On 08/24/2012 01:33 AM, Sunil Mushran wrote: On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 8:44 PM, Tao Ma t...@tao.ma mailto:t...@tao.ma wrote: I guess the final solution will be WRITE_FUA, and I see btrfs uses it to write out the superblock. It will be handled differently by the underlying block

Re: [Ocfs2-devel] RFC: OCFS2 heartbeat improvements

2012-08-23 Thread Jie Liu
On 08/24/12 01:25, Sunil Mushran wrote: On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 9:01 PM, Jie Liu jeff@oracle.com mailto:jeff@oracle.com wrote: BTW, Sunil mentioned there already has an IO priority patch set but not yet merged. However, I only searched an old posts back to 2006 at: