Hello Guys,
This is indeed another deadlock caused by:
Commit 743b5f1434f5 ("ocfs2: take inode lock in
ocfs2_iop_set/get_acl()")
The reason had been explained well by Tariq Saeed in this thread:
https://oss.oracle.com/pipermail/ocfs2-devel/2015-September/011085.html
For this case,
On 10/12/2016 06:54 PM, Eric Ren wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 10/12/2016 05:45 PM, Junxiao Bi wrote:
>> On 10/12/2016 05:34 PM, Eric Ren wrote:
>>> Hi Junxiao,
>>>
>>> On 10/12/2016 02:47 PM, Junxiao Bi wrote:
On 10/12/2016 10:36 AM, Eric Ren wrote:
> Hi,
>
> When backporting those
Hi,
On 10/12/2016 05:45 PM, Junxiao Bi wrote:
> On 10/12/2016 05:34 PM, Eric Ren wrote:
>> Hi Junxiao,
>>
>> On 10/12/2016 02:47 PM, Junxiao Bi wrote:
>>> On 10/12/2016 10:36 AM, Eric Ren wrote:
Hi,
When backporting those patches, I find that they are already in our
product
On 10/12/2016 05:34 PM, Eric Ren wrote:
> Hi Junxiao,
>
> On 10/12/2016 02:47 PM, Junxiao Bi wrote:
>> On 10/12/2016 10:36 AM, Eric Ren wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> When backporting those patches, I find that they are already in our
>>> product kernel, maybe
>>> via "stable kernel" policy, although our
Hi Junxiao,
On 10/12/2016 02:47 PM, Junxiao Bi wrote:
> On 10/12/2016 10:36 AM, Eric Ren wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> When backporting those patches, I find that they are already in our
>> product kernel, maybe
>> via "stable kernel" policy, although our product kernel is 4.4 while the
>> patches were
On 10/12/2016 10:36 AM, Eric Ren wrote:
> Hi,
>
> When backporting those patches, I find that they are already in our
> product kernel, maybe
> via "stable kernel" policy, although our product kernel is 4.4 while the
> patches were merged
> into 4.6.
>
> Seems it's another deadlock that happens
Hi Junxiao,
On 10/11/2016 10:58 AM, Junxiao Bi wrote:
>> Do you think this issue can be fixed by your patches?
> Looks not. Those two patches are to fix recursive locking deadlock. But
> from above call trace, there is no recursive lock.
OK, thanks a lot!
Eric
>
> Thanks,
> Junxiao.
>> I will
Hi Eric,
On 10/11/2016 10:42 AM, Eric Ren wrote:
> Hi Junxiao,
>
> As the subject, the testing hung there on a kernel without your patches:
>
> "ocfs2: revert using ocfs2_acl_chmod to avoid inode cluster lock hang"
> and
> "ocfs2: fix posix_acl_create deadlock"
>
> The stack trace is:
> ```
>
Hi Junxiao,
As the subject, the testing hung there on a kernel without your patches:
"ocfs2: revert using ocfs2_acl_chmod to avoid inode cluster lock hang"
and
"ocfs2: fix posix_acl_create deadlock"
The stack trace is:
```
ocfs2cts1:~ # pstree -pl 24133
