Re: [Ocfs2-devel] [Question] deadlock on chmod when running discontigous block group multiple node testing

2016-10-12 Thread Eric Ren
Hi Junxiao, On 10/12/2016 02:47 PM, Junxiao Bi wrote: > On 10/12/2016 10:36 AM, Eric Ren wrote: >> Hi, >> >> When backporting those patches, I find that they are already in our >> product kernel, maybe >> via "stable kernel" policy, although our product kernel is 4.4 while the >> patches were merg

Re: [Ocfs2-devel] ocfs2-test passed on linux-next/next-20161006

2016-10-12 Thread Eric Ren
Hi Junxiao, On 10/12/2016 02:54 PM, Junxiao Bi wrote: > Hi all, > > I just finished a full ocfs2 test(single/multiple/discontig) on > linux-next/next-20161006. All test case passed. That's a good sign of > quality. Thank you for your effort. Great! Thanks for your efforts! Eric > > Thanks, > Ju

Re: [Ocfs2-devel] [Question] deadlock on chmod when running discontigous block group multiple node testing

2016-10-12 Thread Junxiao Bi
On 10/12/2016 05:34 PM, Eric Ren wrote: > Hi Junxiao, > > On 10/12/2016 02:47 PM, Junxiao Bi wrote: >> On 10/12/2016 10:36 AM, Eric Ren wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> When backporting those patches, I find that they are already in our >>> product kernel, maybe >>> via "stable kernel" policy, although our

Re: [Ocfs2-devel] [Question] deadlock on chmod when running discontigous block group multiple node testing

2016-10-12 Thread Eric Ren
Hi, On 10/12/2016 05:45 PM, Junxiao Bi wrote: > On 10/12/2016 05:34 PM, Eric Ren wrote: >> Hi Junxiao, >> >> On 10/12/2016 02:47 PM, Junxiao Bi wrote: >>> On 10/12/2016 10:36 AM, Eric Ren wrote: Hi, When backporting those patches, I find that they are already in our product ker

Re: [Ocfs2-devel] [Question] deadlock on chmod when running discontigous block group multiple node testing

2016-10-12 Thread Junxiao Bi
On 10/12/2016 06:54 PM, Eric Ren wrote: > Hi, > > On 10/12/2016 05:45 PM, Junxiao Bi wrote: >> On 10/12/2016 05:34 PM, Eric Ren wrote: >>> Hi Junxiao, >>> >>> On 10/12/2016 02:47 PM, Junxiao Bi wrote: On 10/12/2016 10:36 AM, Eric Ren wrote: > Hi, > > When backporting those patches