I think that it is a brief idea and observation:
> On a related note, are there any plans for "Cluster LVM" support
> for OCFS? From a brief look it seems Cluster LVM uses its own
> distributed lock manager, which is different from the one used
> by OCFS2. Would it be possible to use both DLMs
Cool.
Andre Brinkmann wrote:
> I hope this patch is in a better "diff -u -p"-format :-)
>
> Patch for the Makefile
> ===
>
> --- tunefs.ocfs2/Makefile 2006-04-21 23:40:29.0 +0200
> +++ tunefs.ocfs2_new/Makefile 2006-07-21 14:29:48.0 +0200
> @@ -36,6 +36,6 @@ OBJ
I hope this patch is in a better "diff -u -p"-format :-)
Patch for the Makefile
===
--- tunefs.ocfs2/Makefile 2006-04-21 23:40:29.0 +0200
+++ tunefs.ocfs2_new/Makefile 2006-07-21 14:29:48.0 +0200
@@ -36,6 +36,6 @@ OBJS = $(subst .c,.o,$(CFILES))
DIST_FILES = $
Please could you send it to me again in the "diff -u -p" format.
Andre Brinkmann wrote:
> Sorry,
>
> here the patch as text:
>
> For the Makefile:
>
> 39c39
> < $(LINK) $(LIBOCFS2_LIBS) $(LIBO2DLM_LIBS) $(LIBO2CB_LIBS)
> $(COM_ERR_LIBS)
> ---
> > $(LINK) $(LIBOCFS2_LIBS) $(UUID_LIBS) $(L
On Fri, Jul 21, 2006 at 03:33:11PM +0200, Andre Brinkmann wrote:
> here the patch as text:
Wow, excellent. I think you pretty much have it down, even
without reading the patch in full (trusting the tunefs exclusion
mechanisms, getting the uuid code from mfks). But in the future, all
code
Sorry,
here the patch as text:
For the Makefile:
39c39
< $(LINK) $(LIBOCFS2_LIBS) $(LIBO2DLM_LIBS) $(LIBO2CB_LIBS)
$(COM_ERR_LIBS)
---
> $(LINK) $(LIBOCFS2_LIBS) $(UUID_LIBS) $(LIBO2DLM_LIBS)
$(LIBO2CB_LIBS) $(COM_ERR_LIBS)
For tunefs.ocfs2.c:
46a47
> #include
72a74
> in
Joel Becker wrote:
On Thu, Jul 20, 2006 at 07:54:57PM +0200, Andre Brinkmann wrote:
Similar to OCFS2, XFS relies on the uniqueness of a serial number. But
with XFS, I am able to change this uid with a user space admin tool. I
hope to find (or implement) similar features in OCFS2
Michael Wood wrote:
> Andre Brinkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I am trying to couple OCFS2 with a storage virtualization
>> environment to use features like mirroring and snapshots.
>> Unfortunately it seems to be impossible for ocfs2console (and
>> for mount.ocfs2) to distinguish between
Andre Brinkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am trying to couple OCFS2 with a storage virtualization
> environment to use features like mirroring and snapshots.
> Unfortunately it seems to be impossible for ocfs2console (and
> for mount.ocfs2) to distinguish between the original volume
> and its
Miguel Molowny Lopez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would like to use OCFS2 to format a set of 4 200GB slices on 4
> striped disks.
> I would like to see an only file system of 800GB formatted as OCFS2.
> Is it possible to do disk grouping with OCFS2?
> Have I to use LVM or ASM? The problem is th
How have you done to see the logical volume on each node. I only see it
on the node I've created it.
When I try to do mount -a on the second node I get:
ocfs2_hb_ctl: Device name specified was not found while reading uuid
mount.ocfs2: Error when attempting to run /sbin/ocfs2_hb_ctl: "Operation
no
11 matches
Mail list logo
