[Ocfs2-users] ocfs2-1.2.4 RC2 released

2007-01-17 Thread Sunil Mushran
All, http://oss.oracle.com/~smushran/.ocfs2-1.2.4-0.2/ The final 1.2.4 should look very close to this drop. We still have one slippery issue open that we are working on. But, other than that, this drop is looking good. The list of patches added post 1.2.4-0.1 is as follows: r2948: fs - Allow d

Re: [Ocfs2-users] ocfs Vs ocfs2

2007-01-17 Thread Joel Becker
On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 02:06:37AM -0800, Luis Freitas wrote: > It is not using o_direct only if the coreutils package was not installed > on the RH3.0 machine. (coreutils-4.5.3-41.i386.rpm ). > > http://oss.oracle.com/projects/coreutils/files/ > > If it is installed, then both

Re: [Ocfs2-users] OCFS2 crash

2007-01-17 Thread Brian Sieler
Does the slab data have to be right before a crash? Or can we tell from just 2-3 days of data collection? After one day it appears certain numbers from slabinfo are only going up. On 1/17/07, Sunil Mushran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Could be. But I cannot say for sure till I don't get the slab/m

Re: [Ocfs2-users] OCFS2 crash

2007-01-17 Thread Sunil Mushran
Could be. But I cannot say for sure till I don't get the slab/mem data. Brian Sieler wrote: Does this appear to be the same issue as the "OOM Killer" issue previously reported that would be fixed with ocfs2 1.2.4? On 1/16/07, Sunil Mushran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Looks to be running out of

Re: [Ocfs2-users] Re: ocfs Vs ocfs2

2007-01-17 Thread Steffen Roegner
GOKHAN wrote: coreutils-4.5.3-26 is installed on RH3 It is a bit more work than just having it installed: 'man dd' will tell you this: --o_direct Use O_DIRECT file access. Mainly for use with FSâs That support O_DIRECT access. There are three forms --o_direct (selec

Re: [Ocfs2-users] ocfs Vs ocfs2

2007-01-17 Thread Alexei_Roudnev
I have opposite statistics - OCFS (v1) was very slow on 'tar x' and other 'appending file' operations, and OCFSv2 had compatible speed *(with ext3), except it used a lot of CPU to syncronize locks (system was SLES9 SP3 kernel >= 244). Moreover, db1 statuistics below looks wrong - the realistic t

Re: [Ocfs2-users] OCFS2 crash

2007-01-17 Thread Brian Sieler
Does this appear to be the same issue as the "OOM Killer" issue previously reported that would be fixed with ocfs2 1.2.4? On 1/16/07, Sunil Mushran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Looks to be running out of lowmem. # date # cat /proc/meminfo # cat /proc/slabinfo Run a script that dumps the above ev

[Ocfs2-users] Re: ocfs Vs ocfs2

2007-01-17 Thread GOKHAN
coreutils-4.5.3-26 is installed on RH3 RH3: more /etc/issue Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS release 3 (Taroon Update 2) uname -a Linux dbcluster7 2.4.21-40.EL #1 SMP Thu Feb 2 22:12:47 EST 2006 ia64 ia64 ia64 GNU/Linux --- Message: 7 Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 02:06:37 -08

Re: [Ocfs2-users] ocfs Vs ocfs2

2007-01-17 Thread Luis Freitas
Joel, It is not using o_direct only if the coreutils package was not installed on the RH3.0 machine. (coreutils-4.5.3-41.i386.rpm ). http://oss.oracle.com/projects/coreutils/files/ If it is installed, then both tests are using O_DIRECT, and can be compared. I do n