No, the kernel is old. A year+ old.
Refer to this announcement below.
http://oss.oracle.com/pipermail/ocfs2-announce/2008-July/26.html
From the stack, it looks you are encountering the rename/extend race
that was fixed a long time ago.
http://oss.oracle.com/projects/ocfs2/news/article_14.htm
* Tao Ma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [01.08.08 10:58]
Hi,
hanks for your quick reply.
Here the details:
xxx:/ # SPident
CONCLUSION: System is up-to-date!
foundSLE-10-i386-SP1 + "online updates"
xxx:/ # uname -r
2.6.16.46-0.12-bigsmp
xxx:/ # cat /proc/fs/ocfs2/version
OCFS2 1.2.5-SLES-r2997 Tu
Hi,
Please provide the detail info of ocfs2 version which may be helpful
for diagnose.
Peter Selzner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we had this entries in /var/log/messeges a few days ago:
>
> Jul 28 23:30:47 xxx kernel: (12268,2):ocfs2_extend_file:790 ERROR: bug
> expression: i_size_read(inode) !=
Hi,
we had this entries in /var/log/messeges a few days ago:
Jul 28 23:30:47 xxx kernel: (12268,2):ocfs2_extend_file:790 ERROR: bug
expression: i_size_read(inode) != (le64_to_cpu(fe->i_size) - *bytes_extended)
Jul 28 23:30:47 xxx kernel: (12268,2):ocfs2_extend_file:790 ERROR: Inode
8323098 i_si
