Yes. The fix will be in 1.4.4.
On Sep 11, 2009, at 7:20 AM, Tao Ma wrote:
> Hi John,
> John McNulty wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I had a system crash last night. Netconsole caught the following
>> trace dump. Has this one been seen before?
>>
> This bug is fixed in mainline and should show up in next o
hidden file?
Are you encountering an issue whereby you are not recovering space after
you have deleted a file? If so, then that is a known issue in 1.4.1.
Part solution is to upgrade to 1.4.2. The full solution will be available
with OCFS2 1.4.4 that is currently in testing.
If you have support,
All,
Just to let you all know that packages for OCFS2 1.4.2-1 are available
for EL5 U4 and RHEL5 U4.
http://oss.oracle.com/pipermail/el-errata/2009-September/001140.html
http://oss.oracle.com/projects/ocfs2/files/RedHat/RHEL5/
We will not be releasing packages for OCFS2 1.2 for (RH)EL5 U4. Users
Hopefully later today (Sep 8th).
Robin Garner wrote:
> Any indications as to when ocfs2 will be available for RHEL 5.4 ?
>
> Thanks,
> Robin
>
> ___
> Ocfs2-users mailing list
> Ocfs2-users@oss.oracle.com
> http://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/ocfs2-us
Jeremy Schneider wrote:
> Some quick questions for the ocfs2-users list, now that 11.2 is public.
> (Now that it's public knowledge that Oracle developed a whole new
> [propriatery] cluster filesystem from the ground up for RAC.)
>
> 1) Seems that the 11.2 docs encourage using ACFS rather than OCF
For issues on sles, please file a bug/sr with novell.
The issue here is insufficient journal credits. It _could_ be that this
version
is missing mainline git commit e051fda4fd14fe878e6d2183b3a4640febe9e9a8.
But I don't know. Novell Support will be better placed to track down the
issue.
Sérgio S
Can you describe the mount lock?
You don't have to limit the mount to just one node. Have both
nodes mount the volume but run mysql only on one node only.
Sunil
James Devine wrote:
> I am trying to make a mysql standby setup with 2 machines, one primary
> and one hot standby, which both share di
Late this year, early next year.
Gonçalo Borges wrote:
> Hi Sunil
>
> Thanks for the reply. What's the time frame to release OCFS2 1.6?
>
> Cheers
> Goncalo
>
>
> On 08/25/2009 05:13 PM, Sunil Mushran wrote:
>> So this is a known issue on OCFS2 1.4/(RH)EL5 c
So this is a known issue on OCFS2 1.4/(RH)EL5 combination. As in, this
will _work_ on OCFS2 1.2 on the same kernel and _should_ work with OCFS2
bundled with the mainline kernels. But not on the specific combination you
are using.
In short, the xm save/dump-core implementation in 2.6.18 is hacky. A
ocfs2 and kernel versions?
Gonçalo Borges wrote:
> Hi All...
>
> I'm testing a Xen solution on an OCFS2 SAN to store VM images,
> and I'm observing an interoperability issue between two kinds of
> softwares.
>
> I've already tried to obtain some feedback from Xen experts without
> any success. May
So a delete was called for some inodes that had not been orphaned.
The pre-checks detected the same and correctly aborted the deletes.
No harm done.
No, the messages do not pinpoint the device. It's something we discussed
adding, but have not done it as yet.
Next time this happens and you can ide
2.6.31-rc1.
Brian Kroth wrote:
> I didn't see this in the bug list. Which mainline release is this fixed
> in?
>
> Thanks,
> Brian
>
> Sunil Mushran 2009-08-20 17:46:
>
>> Yes, this is a known issue in OCFS2 1.4.1 and 1.4.2. That is assuming
>> no
Yes, this is a known issue in OCFS2 1.4.1 and 1.4.2. That is assuming
no process in the cluster has that file open. We have the fix. It will be
available with 1.4.3 which is in testing.
This was discussed in the email announcing the 1.4.2 release.
==
Sure.
Raheel Akhtar wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I have existing OCFS2 cluster (1.4.2-1.el5) with kernel version
> RedHat 5.3 Enterprise kernel version 2.6.18-128.1.16.el5. I am going
> to add 2 new nodes with RedHat 5.3 enterprise kernel version
> 2.6.18-128.el5.
>
>
>
> My question Can I add 2
This is a feature. ;)
If you have mounted a volume on two or more nodes, the expectation
is that the private interconnect will always remain up. If you shutdown
the network on a node, the cluster stack will have to kill a node. It
does so inorder to prevent hangs in cluster operations.
In a 2 nod
The nodes are failing to connect to each other on that interface.
Ensure the ips are correct. The firewalls are disabled or have the
rules to enable the traffic on port (or whatever you have set).
You can use "ping -I ethX ipaddress" to check whether the ip is valid.
Saranya Sivakumar wrote:
With the o2cb stack, the network traffic will mostly be dlm related.
Lock co-ordination. No ios.
With the pacemaker stack, you will have some traffic required for ordered
messaging too. I don't have the details on it. Again, no ios.
For o2cb, the packets should be small. Tiny infact. But there ca
When are the /dev/mapper paths created?
McKinley, Reid wrote:
>
> I should mention that the OCFS2 mount points mount fine when the
> manual mount is done after the reboot.
>
> Cmds for manual mounting:
>
>
>
> mount -o datavolume,nointr,_netdev,noatime -t ocfs2 /dev/mapper/mpath0
> /u02
>
> mo
t; clusters mount the same device as long as the ocfs2 versions match?
>
> Regards,
> Saranya Sivakumar
>
>
> --------
> *From:* Sunil Mushran
> *To:* Saranya Sivakumar
> *Sent:* Wednesday, August 5, 2009 12:
Raheel Akhtar wrote:
> That mean for kernel 2.6.30 (current stable kernel ) version, I don't need
> to download ocfs2, just download tools and console?, because ocfs2 is only
> available for 2.6.18.x kernel.
The mainline kernel includes ocfs2, the file system. You have to of course
build it.
The
Raheel Akhtar wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> According to this site, http://oss.oracle.com/osswiki/OCFS2/Roadmap
> cluster ware flock feature is available in (2.6.25) for Red hat 5.2 U2.
>
> But on download page of OCFS2 website I didn’t find 2.6.25 version for
> 64 bit Red Hat Linux 5.2.
>
> Current downloa
Peter W. Morreale wrote:
> Can someone explain the implications of the "barrier=[0,1]" mount option
> in OCFS2?
A common misconception with disks is that when it acknowledges a write,
that that write has hit the platter. This is not the case with disks that
have their own caches. Earlier it was n
ocfs2 1.2.3 is 3 years old. Suggest you upgrade that to 1.2.9.
1.2.3 and 1.2.9 are not network compatible. The mount will fail.
Saranya Sivakumar wrote:
> Hi,
> We have a shared backup storage that resides on EMC storage and
> mounted using ocfs2 1.2.3 on a physical standby database in productio
Peter W. Morreale wrote:
> So, regardless of the blocksize the file system was configured with, HB
> only looks at a sector per node, is that right?
>
Yes. The hb thread figures out the sector size using ioctl(BLSSZGET).
Idea is to minimize the hb io to the minimum.
___
Peter W. Morreale wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm trying to determine the performance implications of various
> configurations for ocfs2. (I'm new to ocfs2, but have read through all
> the docs for both 1.2 and 1.4, so please be gentle :) This would be a
> 1.4 installation.
>
> I searched through www.
"device busy" could be because you have a shell having that as the cwd.
Check:
ls -l /proc/[0-9]*/cwd
Georg Höllrigl wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've several LUNs mounted in a 7 node cluster - one LUN which is only used on
> 4 of the nodes.
>
> It's impossible to umount this LUN - I'm always getting devi
11:09:45 alf1 kernel: ocfs2_dlm: Nodes in domain
> ("7BE7E9E2026A40F8801B56257D805C88"): 0 1 2 3 4 5
> --
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Sunil Mushran [mailto:sunil.mush...@oracle.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2009 1:25 PM
ocfs2_stackglue not found error message is harmless.
We use the same init script for all versions of the fs stackglue
is present in the current mainline and will be in ocfs2 1.6.
Raheel Akhtar wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> When system booting getting error message “modprobe: FATAL: Module
> ocfs2_stackg
Please file a bugzilla and attach the netconsole logs of all six nodes.
The messages provided indicate that that node saw the two nodes
become unresponsive. As to why they became unresponsive will be
known only after we see the netconsole logs of the two nodes.
Raheel Akhtar wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>
Please file a bugzilla @ oss.oracle.com/bugzilla
Attach this to it.
On Jul 15, 2009, at 6:37 PM, Marco Huang
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi Tiger,
>
> I am also exporting the ocfs2 file system via nfs (with acl) to other
> servers. I am getting the following k
This patch should be in ocfs2-1.4. It is not in ocfs2-1.2. Ignore the
kernel version. Both 1.2 and 1.4 work on el5.
On Jul 15, 2009, at 3:41 AM, Kevin Clark
wrote:
> I've run into a problem mounting an OCFS2 filesystem on a DRBD
> device. I think it's the same one discussed at
> http://l
Please do remember to file a bugzilla. Once it is fixed, add the git
commit details to it.
On Jul 15, 2009, at 4:15 AM, Tiger Yang wrote:
> Hi, Marco,
>
> Thanks a lot, it is really a bug in ocfs2 acl. I can reproduce it now
> and find the cause. I will send a patch to fix it after done some
a noob, so I don't
> even know if it is a bug, or a misconfiguration, or a misunderstanding.
>
> PS. Is nodiratime option supported for mounts? I used it, but I don't
> see it in the user-guide.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Sunil Mushran
> To: sylarrr
The fix was for the oops you saw.
The hang is a different issue. We have no info on that.
For that, if you would like to diagnose the problem, read up the dlm notes
in the 1.4 user's guide. It explains a debugging process vis-a-vis hangs.
If the issue is dlm related, then we would like to have t
Fixed. Details in http://oss.oracle.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=914
syla...@aim.com wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On kernel 2.6.30 (and I have upgraded drbd there too to 8.3.2) I have
> nothing in the logs, and the umount hangs, and after a few minutes the
> whole computer hangs, and I have to hard r
Google it.
On Jul 4, 2009, at 7:58 PM, Raheel Akhtar wrote:
> Hi Sunil,
>
> Do you mind to send me link how to setup netconsole on RedHat I
> never did
> before.
> Highly appreciated.
>
> Raheel
>
>
> -----Original Message-
> From: Sunil Mushran [mai
Setup netconsole to trap the logs. Once you have it then file a
bugzilla and attach the logs of all 5 nodes.
On Jul 4, 2009, at 7:46 PM, Raheel Akhtar wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I am using OCFS2 1.4.2-1 for RedHat Linux 5.2 64 bit
> (2.6.18-128.1.6.el5) for 5 nodes. I notices sometime system just
ng documents on Repository which
> is mounted with OCFS2.
>
> That mean I can add 64bit Red Hat node in current 32 bit OCFS2 cluster?
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Sunil Mushran [mailto:sunil.mush...@oracle.com]
> Sent: Thursday, J
to their repository. Having
said that, a 64-bit system does not necessarily imply 64-bit apps.
The apps itself could be 32-bit.
Sunil Mushran wrote:
> Yes.
>
> But do read the notes section in the ocfs2 user's guide. It talks
> about having nodes with different compute power in a cl
Explain "repository built by OCFS2 1.4.x"? What is this repository?
OCFS2, the file system, is architecture neutral. Meaning, it works
across 32-bit, 64-bit, little endian and big endian boxes. One can
mount an ocfs2 volume concurrently on x86, x86_64, ia64 and ppc64
nodes. They all have to be Lin
s:
> Jun 24 11:43:01 node5 kernel: [855031.567140]
> (20663,7):dlm_send_remote_unlock_request:359 ERROR: status = -107
> Jun 24 11:43:01 node5 kernel: [855031.567140]
> (20663,7):dlm_send_remote_unlock_request:359 ERROR: status = -107
>
> The problem is that I couldn't acce
logs.
Kris Buytaert wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-06-24 at 12:02 -0700, Sunil Mushran wrote:
>
>> Do you have a separate network path for drbd traffic? If you do
>> not, then you are probably overloading the network. In this case,
>> I believe drbd is unable to replicate the
The nodes are not frozen. The processes that are attempting to talk
to the "disconnected" node are waiting for that node to reply, failing
which, to die. The default timeout for the disk heartbeat is 60 secs.
If that node simply died, the other nodes would have deemed the node
dead after 60 secs,
Do you have a separate network path for drbd traffic? If you do
not, then you are probably overloading the network. In this case,
I believe drbd is unable to replicate the ios fast enough and thus
is blocking the o2cb disk heartbeat. One workaround is to increase
the O2CB_HEARTBEAT_THRESHOLD to mor
Not sure why you think it is trying to connect to itself. o2net
connects to other nodes only.
Raheel Akhtar wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have OCFS2 Cluster of 5 nodes running on RHEL 5.2 (kernel version
> 2.6.18-128.1.10.el5). I am getting error like
>
> Jun 24 09:26:54 alf2 kernel: (2095,0):o2net_connec
ocfs2 is a shared disk cluster file system. All nodes need to have
access to the disk. Typical technologies involved are fiber channel
and iscsi. If you are in a virtual environment, then you could present
a local device as shared to multiple guests.
On Jun 24, 2009, at 2:51 AM, "sheri...@ho
Senmiao Chen wrote:
> Whenever I tried to mount an OCFS2 volume I got the following message,
> "ocfs2_fill_super:1016 ERROR: User quotas were requested, but this
> filesystem does not have the feature enabled." Just wonder how to enable
> this feature. The ocfs2 wiki says "you'll need support in
Brian Kroth wrote:
> Sunil Mushran 2009-06-16 16:38:
>
>> LOOKING AHEAD
>>
>> We are aiming to release OCFS2 1.6 later this year. This release will
>> include the features that we have worked on over the past year. These are:
>>
>> 1. Extended Attrib
Please file a bugzilla and _attach_ this oops trace. Also mention all
the version numbers.
On Jun 17, 2009, at 2:30 AM, "McDonald, Stuart" > wrote:
Hi
We have a two-node RAC cluster, which uses ASM for the database
storage, but is using OCFS2 to mount a couple of file systems for a)
th
All,
We are pleased to announce the release of OCFS2 1.4.2-1 and OCFS2 Tools
1.4.2-1 for Oracle's and Red Hat's Enterprise Linux 5 Update 2 and higher.
Oracle's Unbreakable Linux Network users who are subscribing to the "OCFS2
1.4 packages for Enterprise Linux 5" channel can upgrade to this relea
Please file a bugzilla in oss.oracle.com/bugzilla.
Saul Gabay wrote:
>
> We have a 2 node OCFS2 cluster running Oracle 10g, both nodes crashed.
>
>
>
> Node 1 because it panic running IOSTAT, the second node crashed with
> this error message you can see below.
>
>
>
> I was hoping to see a ne
ree working nodes in order to run /etc/init.d/o2cb offline on each one
> followed by /etc/init.d/o2cb start?
>
> Best Regards
>
> John
>
> On Thu, 2009-06-11 at 07:33 -0700, Sunil Mushran wrote:
>
>> Add a rule to allow traffic on port (or whatever it is
iranha which invokes
> iptables. What should I add to iptables to enable interconnect
> traffic?
>
> TIA
>
> John
>
> On Wed, 2009-06-10 at 10:18 -0700, Sunil Mushran wrote:
>> ensure iptables is either off or has rules for the interconnect
>> traffic.
>>
There is another scheme (less elegant but probably quicker to deploy) that
was described in this list by a user.
As root run blkid. Then edit /etc/blkid.tab and remove all sd devices that
correspond to the emcpp devices. Ensure pp is enabled. Rerun blkid. This
time you should see the pp devices in
ensure iptables is either off or has rules for the interconnect traffic.
use tcpdump to see if packets are coming thru. The connect request
is initiated between two nodes is initiated when both of them first
mount a common volume. Also, the connect request is always from
the higher node to the low
Sure. One can use ocfs2 to host almost anything. The one exception
is the crs_home. crs_home needs to be on a local volume.
OCFS 1.2/1.4 has two limits. Like ext3, the number of sub-directories in _a_
directory cannot exceed 32000. (There is no limit to the number of subdirs
in a volume.) The othe
florian.engelm...@bt.com wrote:
> We tried to use ocfs2 with Vserver clustered with Heartbeat. But
> Vservers need barrier=1. That did not work on our shared storage with
> ocfs2 but I guess this is no ocfs2 problem it is a device mapper problem
> because we need to use multipath and LVM2, isn't it
Are you sure you are mounting the same volume on both nodes?
Do on both nodes:
debugfs.ocfs2 -R "stats" /dev/sdX | grep UUID
It should be the same.
Ensure you don't have any local iscsi caching enabled.
Bengtsson Anders wrote:
>
> I’m trying to mount a ocfs2 volume (created on sles11) on my sle
Actually, it is not complex.
o2cb timeouts: If not using multipathing/netbonding, leave the timeouts
as it. If using multipathing, double the disk hearbeat to 120 secs.
If using netbonding, double the network idle to 60 secs. Ensure your
private network has no loops to prevent spanning tree protoc
> node:
> ip_port =
> ip_address = 192.168.0.217
> number = 1
> name = nyclx2
> cluster = tiaa
>
> cluster:
> node_count = 2
> name = tiaa
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Sunil Mushran [mailto:sunil.mush...@or
ed
> Driver for "ocfs2_dlmfs": Loaded
> Filesystem "ocfs2_dlmfs": Mounted
> Checking O2CB cluster tiaa: Online
> Heartbeat dead threshold = 31
> Network idle timeout: 3
> Network keepalive delay: 2000
> Network reconnect delay: 2000
> Checking O2CB
]# service iptables status
> Firewall is stopped.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Sunil Mushran [mailto:sunil.mush...@oracle.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2009 12:57 PM
> To: McKinley, Reid
> Cc: ocfs2-users@oss.oracle.com
> Subject: Re: [Ocfs2-users] O2CB heart
Which cluster stack are you using? o2cb or pacemaker?
Shaffin Bhanji wrote:
> I have a 2 node cluster setup but am at a loss as to why I cannot
> mount a shared ocfs2 filesystem on both nodes being shared by iSCSI?
> Am I wrong in understanding that this can be achieved?
>
> I am using OpenAIS und
minues. Then, I can select "format".
>
> Let me know if you need further details.
> Thanks,
> Reid
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Sunil Mushran [mailto:sunil.mush...@oracle.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2009 12:48 PM
> To: McKinley, Reid
> Cc: o
The connect requests are not getting through. Do you
have any firewalls setup? Is iptables running? If so, either
shut it down or allow traffic on the o2cb port.
McKinley, Reid wrote:
>
> We are having trouble getting the 2^nd node in our 2 node RAC
> configuration to have an active O2CB heartbea
McKinley, Reid wrote:
> No, "mounted.ocfs2 -d" comes back in less than 5 seconds.
>
>
You said it taking 30 mins to do any action. Can you expand
on that? As in, possibly walk us through your steps.
___
Ocfs2-users mailing list
Ocfs2-users@oss.oracle
McKinley, Reid wrote:
>
> Ever since we have installed OCFS2, we have had extremely slow
> performance in the ocfs2console. It can take us over 30 minutes to do
> the simplest tasks.
>
>
>
> We do not have this type of performance with other xwindows
> applications on our server.
>
>
>
> D
khaije rock wrote:
> 90% of my way through the recovery and it turns out that each of the
> more volume-wide rdump attemps were chocking at the same specific
> point: a symlink pointing to a directory on a different filesystem
> that then descended back into the ocfs volume.
>
> Looking like thi
jhonyl wrote:
> Thanks for your reply.
>
> Good to know... time to upgrade the kernel.
>
> Is there a minimum required pacemaker or cman version too?
> With pacemaker does it need heartbeat or openais for this? or either?
> And if it maters what is the minimum version required for openais or
> hea
jhonyl wrote:
> If I will add pacemaker or cman package to my current OS, since
> cluster fcntl is probably a new feature, is there a minimum version
> number for fcntl to be supported?
The support for clustered fcntl in ocfs2 was added in 2.6.27.
___
jhonyl wrote:
> I am trying to figure out about locking under ocfs2.
>
> I read in the 1.4 ocfs2 pdf doc file that ocfs2 1.4 support flock but
> not fcntl locks, and in a message, I read that ocfs2 rely on vfs for
> fcntl, and I read something about being able to get fcntl locks but not
> with o
You are using ocfs2 atop lvm - a non-cluster-aware volume manager.
A lot of things can go wrong in this combination. Quite a few have
been reported on this forum.
debugfs.ocfs2 has commands dump and rdump that allows users to
read the files directly off the disk. Use it to recover your data.
khai
Kernel: 2.6.26-1-amd64 x86_64
>
> modinfo ocfs2:
> version:1.5.0
> description:OCFS2 1.5.0
> srcversion: B19D847BA86E871E41B7A64
> vermagic: 2.6.26-1-amd64 SMP mod_unload modversions
>
> ocfs2-tools:
> Version: 1.4.1-1
>
> Tia,
> Kees Hoekzema
kernel version, ocfs2 version?
$ uname -a
$ modinfo ocfs2
$ rpm -qa | grep ocfs2
Kees Hoekzema wrote:
> Hello List,
>
> At the moment I'm running a 7-node ocfs2 cluster on a Dell MD3000i (iscsi)
> NAS. This cluster has run fine for well over a year now, but recently one of
> the older and more u
Refer to the section on oracle rdbms in the 1.4 user's guide.
Specifically mount options.
On May 27, 2009, at 4:55 AM, Devender Narula
wrote:
>
> Hi team
>
> I had installed OCFS2 on RHEL5.0 . every thing looks fine but when I
> was installing CRS on the node I got error message OCFS2 is n
There are no known issues with using ocfs2 on a jumbo frame enabled
private network.
On May 26, 2009, at 8:38 AM, Sridhar Avantsa wrote:
> When using OCFS2 in a Oracle RAC set, one would configure OCFS2 to
> use the private interconnect address ( in cluster.conf).
> Are there any known issue
>
> ocfs2console-1.4.1-1.el5
>
> ocfs2-tools-1.4.1-1.el5
>
> [r...@eregtest2 software]# uname -a
>
> Linux eregtest2.admin.abdn.ac.uk 2.6.18-92.el5 #1 SMP Tue Apr 29
> 13:16:15 EDT 2008 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
>
>
> --- On Mon, 5/25/09, Sunil Mushran wr
The ocfs2 kernel driver is missing. Read the user's guide or the FAQ
to learn how to install the driver.
On May 25, 2009, at 8:16 AM, Devender Narula
wrote:
>
> HI Team
>
> When ever i try to configure o2cb . i get below mention proble.. its
> a production installation and your quick help
Use sles or (rh)el. It won't work on other distros.
On May 24, 2009, at 3:43 PM, sundar mahadevan wrote:
> To add some more details to this issue:
>
> /u01/oradata/orcl/orcl/cmquorumfile mentioned in the error message is
> accessible from the shell prompt. I even checked the file
> $ORACLE_HOME/
Brian Kroth wrote:
> That's what's always held me back from doing this as well. Will the
> common stack be the openais stack (ie: the so called user stack), the
> o2cb stack, or something completely different?
Currently the o2cb userspace clusterstack is directed towards supporting
the native clu
Brian Kroth wrote:
> Luis Freitas 2009-05-20 10:46:
>>I am not aware of any filesystem that can withstand a online fsck.
>>Sun ZFS can do online correction, but it doesnt have a fsck tool.
> I hear btrfs will support this. It may be a feature that's easier to
> accomplish with copy on wri
Christian van Barneveld wrote:
> No, I don't have the full output, but I still have the snapshots that I've
> made before teh FSCK. I've mounted it at a different server and ran a
> (readonly) FSCK. See attached output.
The output shows i/o errors. It is unable to read the blocks beyond
a certai
Christian van Barneveld wrote:
> Our OCFS2 cluster has been stable for approx 8 months, but since this week it
> went wrong. First we had high load problems. We had this problem because a
> couple of directories got filled with files, 1 directory over 1,5 milion
> files (symlinks) and NFS (mount
McKinley, Reid wrote:
>
> We are trying to figure out why our OCFS2 mount points will not
> automatically mount on reboot.
>
> We are on OEL version 2.6.18-92.el5 and we are using multipathing.
>
> Here are the OCFS2 entries in /etc/fstab.
>
> /dev/dm-2 /oracw oracle_clusterware datavolume,nointr,
Damon Miller wrote:
> The two servers are actually connected to the same switch. We are using
> iptables for basic packet filtering on all of our hosts, but TCP/ is open
> on all machines participating in the cluster. iSCSI is also enabled on
> TCP/3260. Here are the relevant excerpts fro
Damon Miller wrote:
> We're running a 3-node OCFS2 1.2.9 cluster with a 5-TB iSCSI block device as
> the backing store. All machines are running CentOS, with the iSCSI target
> running CentOS 5.2 and the initiators running CentOS 4.7. The purpose of the
> cluster is to evaluate alternatives to
Did you run fsck with the force flag?
$ fsck.ocfs2 -f /dev/sdX
By default, fsck only replays the journals.
Paul Taylor wrote:
> Hi
>
> errors like the one listed below have been coming through in our logs on
> a daily basis. We tried to run fsck.ocfs2 over the file system bet it
> thinks that i
Gavin Hamill wrote:
> ocfs2 1.4 has a maximum of 32000 files in any single directory - we got
> bitten by this bug recently. If you're talking about 5 million files,
> then is there's a possibility you've encountered this limit?
Incorrect. The limit is 32000 sub-dirs in a directory. There is
no sp
http://oss.oracle.com/~smushran/.debug/scripts/stat_sysdir.sh
Please file a bugzilla and attach the output of the above script.
http://oss.oracle.com/bugzilla
I think I know the issue. No, it is not related to blocksize/clustersize.
Sunil
Nigel Bishop wrote:
>
> Afternoon,
>
> We have an ocfs2
Andrew (Anything) wrote:
> Ive been testing using bonnie++ -n 50:1024:0:10 -s 0. Is this a bad way to
> test?
> Some raw results follow later in case you want them.
>
> Obviously ocfs2 should be slower than ext3.
> But I guess I expected a single node ocfs node to be only doing internal
> stuff wit
pr 29 12:01:17 nyclx2 kernel: ocfs2: Unmounting device (8,0) on (node
> 255)
>
> Thanks again,
> Reid
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Sunil Mushran [mailto:sunil.mush...@oracle.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2009 4:32 PM
> To: McKinley, Reid
> Cc: ocfs2-users@oss.
What does "mounted.ocfs2 -d" say on both nodes?
Not /var/log/dmesg. It is /var/log/messages. You could instead
run "dmesg". This is important as it will tell you why the
mount failed.
Sunil
McKinley, Reid wrote:
> Thank you!
>
> Everything appears to be fine then, except that we cannot mount an
McKinley, Reid wrote:
>
> We have installed OCFS2 1.4.1 and for some reason we can only get the
> mount point mounted on 1 of 2 nodes. The 2^nd node shows that the
> heartbeat is not active.
>
>
>
> [r...@nyclx2 ~]# service o2cb status
>
> Driver for "configfs": Loaded
>
> Filesystem "configf
ave mounted the particular filesystem?
>
> Søren
>
> On 28/04/2009, at 22.21, Sunil Mushran wrote:
>
>> Søren Kröger wrote:
>>> I'm trying to split up our big OCFS2 filesystem into 3 separate
>>> LUN's, since there are only a limited amount of nodes which
Søren Kröger wrote:
> I'm trying to split up our big OCFS2 filesystem into 3 separate LUN's,
> since there are only a limited amount of nodes which need access to
> the different parts of the OCFS2 filesystem.
> One "Master" server with RW access should still be able to mount all 3
> OCFS2 LUN's
While a node can only be in one cluster, it can be in many
different dlm domains (or lock name spaces), each of which
can have a different collection of nodes. But in the end,
the sum total of all nodes in all domains will still part
of one cluster.
What are you trying to do?
Sunil
Søren Kröger
Please file a bugzilla. Add this stack trace to it.
http://oss.oracle.com/bugzilla
Also add any detail about your environment that you feel
could be relevant. Size of cluster, number of mounts, etc.
Thanks
Sunil
James Masson wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> We've just had a kernel panic/reboot on one of ou
File a bugzilla (oss.oracle.com/bugzilla) for this issue. Attach
the stack trace.
Also attach the output of the following.
$ find /lib/modules/`uname -r`/kernel/fs/ocfs2 -name \*.ko -exec objdump
-DSl {} >/tmp/ocfs2.syms \;
Sunil
Konstantin Tikhonov wrote:
> Нi,
> I have a cluster with 5 nodes
s version 95, which doesn't
> create them for me.
> Version 127 I used for tests already creates them correctly..
> BR
> nik
>
> On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 12:08:34PM -0700, Sunil Mushran wrote:
>
>> AFAIK, this is not an issue on (rh)el4/sles9. It could be that
Yes. This issue has nothing to do with taf or asm. You are seeing
transient EIOs during archiver writes. Follow Srini's suggestion
of filing a SR and then pinging him.
The other issue about instances altering the service names is
unrelated. Atleast we should consider it unrelated as they have
noth
501 - 600 of 1424 matches
Mail list logo
