Em Thu, 3 Feb 2011 15:45:31 -0200
Henrique Fernandes escreveu:
>
> No other docs for performance improvement for maildir ?
>
Dovecot and courier has its own Maildir extensions called Maildir++.
http://www.inter7.com/courierimap/README.maildirquota.html
http://wiki.dovecot.org/MailboxFormat/Ma
So you are using only one imap server ? And only if it fails the other one
assumes ? Don't you have any balancer ?
How is the backup of that data ? As i said, is really slow the backup here.
The use of this 6gb ram, how much it is cached ? Or all 6gb are used by
mailscaner postfix and dovecot ?
Hello,
My setup consists with 2 backend mail servers, running
dovecot/postfix/mailscanner in primary/secondary mode. The primary
server has 6GB ram, and the seconadary a virtual machine with 2GB ram.
Both servers using a external SAN over fiber. I have over 15.000users,
and the performance is very
I just read some, the problems is it will be to difficult to us to migrate
it now. Because they migrate into ocfs2 quite recently.
No other docs for performance improvement for maildir ?
[]'sf.rique
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 4:40 AM, Antonis Kopsaftis wrote:
> Hello,
>
> You should read the arc
It shouldn't. But I have been known to be wrong before.
And testing with different commit values is easy enough.
On 02/02/2011 06:03 PM, Henrique Fernandes wrote:
Thanks for the tips.
So you are saying that if both nodes have same load, inscrease comit time will
not make any diferences ?
[]
Thanks for the tips.
So you are saying that if both nodes have same load, inscrease comit time
will not make any diferences ?
[]'sf.rique
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 11:54 PM, Sunil Mushran wrote:
> # grep "Resources" /sys/kernel/debug/o2dlm/UUID/dlm_state
> Lock Resources: 20713 (1139459)
>
> T
# grep "Resources" /sys/kernel/debug/o2dlm/UUID/dlm_state
Lock Resources: 20713 (1139459)
The first number is number of live resources. Second the number
of resources created for the life of the domain.
If you see the the number of resources levelling off but the second
number incrementing, that
centos 5.5
ocfs2 1.4
The mail solution, dovecot+postifx+mailscaner uses about 1 gb the machine
has 1.5 in my tests i am rising it to 3gb so it have 2gb of cached
How many memory do you thing i should separeted for cache ?
When we made some tests ocfs2 1.4 had better performance than 1.6 but or
version? distro?
This workload will benefit a lot with the indexed directories available in
ocfs2 1.6 (and mainline and sles11).
The other thing to check is the amount memory in the virtual machines.
File systems need memory to cache the inodes. If memory is lacking,
the inodes are freed and hav
Hello,
First of all, i am new at the list and i have several questions about ocfs2
performance.
Where i am working i am having huge performance problens with ocfs2.
Let me tell my envoriment.
3 Xen VirtualMachines withs ocfs2 mounting an LUN exported over iSCSI. (
acctualy 3 LUNS, 3 ocfs2 clust
10 matches
Mail list logo
