Re: [OctDev] data smoothing functions

2008-03-31 Thread Jaroslav Hajek
> Although I have come across the concept of kernel-based methods, I still > do not understand exactly what that means. I am an engineer who dabbles > in applied mathematics. I do not think the method I have implemented is > kernel-based. It is sometimes known as "penalized least squares"[1]

Re: [OctDev] [PATCH] clean targets for audio

2008-03-31 Thread Thomas Treichl
Rafael Laboissiere schrieb: > The *clean targets in src/Makefile of the audio package do not follow the > GNU standards [1]. In particular, distclean removes configure, which should > be in the distribution. The patch below fixes this. > > [1] http://www.gnu.org/software/womb/gnits/Standard-Targ

[OctDev] [PATCH] clean targets for audio

2008-03-31 Thread Rafael Laboissiere
The *clean targets in src/Makefile of the audio package do not follow the GNU standards [1]. In particular, distclean removes configure, which should be in the distribution. The patch below fixes this. [1] http://www.gnu.org/software/womb/gnits/Standard-Targets.html Also, please drop config.log

Re: [OctDev] Bug in Octave 3.0.0

2008-03-31 Thread John W. Eaton
On 30-Mar-2008, Ben Abbott wrote: | On Mar 30, 2008, at 1:30 AM, Dmitri A. Sergatskov wrote: | > On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 11:42 PM, Chris Tandiono | > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | >> When using the run command, the working directory is not the expected | >> working directory. Should this be changed

Re: [OctDev] data smoothing functions

2008-03-31 Thread Jonathan Stickel
Jaroslav Hajek wrote: > On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 5:38 PM, Jonathan Stickel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Firstly, I would like to ask about the spline-gcvspl package, which >> provides a nice way to smooth data. What is the origin of the non-free >> license? I looked at the source link for the f

Re: [OctDev] data smoothing functions

2008-03-31 Thread David Bateman
Jonathan Stickel wrote: > Firstly, I would like to ask about the spline-gcvspl package, which > provides a nice way to smooth data. What is the origin of the non-free > license? I looked at the source link for the fortran dependency and > performed a google search, but I cannot find the posted

Re: [OctDev] data smoothing functions

2008-03-31 Thread Jaroslav Hajek
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 5:38 PM, Jonathan Stickel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Firstly, I would like to ask about the spline-gcvspl package, which > provides a nice way to smooth data. What is the origin of the non-free > license? I looked at the source link for the fortran dependency and > pe

[OctDev] [PATCH] autoloads for fixed

2008-03-31 Thread Rafael Laboissiere
In the process of building the Debian package for fixed, I found a problem related to PKG_ADD. The files fixed.cc, fsort.m, and fixedpoint.m have "PKG_ADD:" directives and those end up in the files: /usr/lib/octave/packages/fixed-0.7.5/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-api-v32/PKG_ADD /usr/share/octave

[OctDev] data smoothing functions

2008-03-31 Thread Jonathan Stickel
Firstly, I would like to ask about the spline-gcvspl package, which provides a nice way to smooth data. What is the origin of the non-free license? I looked at the source link for the fortran dependency and performed a google search, but I cannot find the posted license anywhere. Does the no