Re: [OctDev] Invalid order 18 for Galois Field

2008-12-05 Thread dbateman
On Fri, Dec 05, 2008 at 10:21:32AM +0100, Marco Maso wrote: > When you talk about maximum grade 31 for a x86 and 63 for a x86_64 what > are you referring? > If you are referring to the grade of the generator polynomial I'm stuck > and I couldn't do anything without heavily moddifying the code (if I

Re: [OctDev] [patch] place function in control package

2008-12-05 Thread dbateman
On Fri, Dec 05, 2008 at 02:54:27PM +0100, Luca Favatella wrote: > On 05/12/2008, Luca Favatella <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [...] > > I propose this change to the INDEX file: > > -suggest using the place function instead of the acker (Matlab) function > > I thought that it is better to provide th

Re: [OctDev] [patch] place function in control package

2008-12-05 Thread Luca Favatella
On 05/12/2008, Luca Favatella <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] > I propose this change to the INDEX file: > -suggest using the place function instead of the acker (Matlab) function I thought that it is better to provide the acker function instead of just suggesting to use place instead of acker.

[OctDev] [patch] place function in control package

2008-12-05 Thread Luca Favatella
Hi. I'm referring to the control package in current svn (r5476). I propose these changes to the place.m file: -add the signature "place(a,b,p)" (for Matlab compatibility) -add 1 test for the old signature -add 1 test for the new signature -substitute a hard-coded controllability matrix computat

Re: [OctDev] arpack install failed (Ubuntu) Fixed

2008-12-05 Thread R.N.Palmer
> I have a symlink libarpack.so pointing to libarpack.so.2.1 in my > debian/sid. Does creating it help? Yes, that made it work. (It appears the problem was that I installed the non-dev version: libarpack2-dev automatically creates this link but libarpack2 doesn't.) To prevent others having the

Re: [OctDev] Invalid order 18 for Galois Field

2008-12-05 Thread Marco Maso
When you talk about maximum grade 31 for a x86 and 63 for a x86_64 what are you referring? If you are referring to the grade of the generator polynomial I'm stuck and I couldn't do anything without heavily moddifying the code (if I've understood well), if you are talking about the galois field "car

Re: [OctDev] arpack install failed (Ubuntu)

2008-12-05 Thread LUK ShunTim
R.N.Palmer wrote: > Debian have already agreed that the new license is free: the ARPACK > library (but not this Octave binding) has now been re-added to Debian > unstable, after being removed when someone noticed the old license's > restrictions a few months ago. > http://packages.qa.debian.org/a/a