On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 1:30 PM, Søren Hauberg wrote:
> fre, 05 02 2010 kl. 13:26 -0500, skrev Michael A. Repucci:
> > There appears to be a discrepancy between the values returned by the
> > prctile function in statistics-1.0.9 and the prctile function in
> > Octave 3.2.3 base or Matlab.
>
> If t
fre, 05 02 2010 kl. 13:26 -0500, skrev Michael A. Repucci:
> There appears to be a discrepancy between the values returned by the
> prctile function in statistics-1.0.9 and the prctile function in
> Octave 3.2.3 base or Matlab.
If the 'prctile' function is in core Octave, then I don't think we
sho
There appears to be a discrepancy between the values returned by the prctile
function in statistics-1.0.9 and the prctile function in Octave 3.2.3 base
or Matlab.
Try:
x=[0.99681 0.65388 0.98868 0.89723 0.82408 0.91875 0.65341
0.98494 0.8 0.98451 0.99612 0.85303 0.98375
fre, 05 02 2010 kl. 02:36 -0800, skrev dbateman:
> Søren Hauberg wrote:
> > If memory serves me correct, then the ARPACK functions (eigs, ...) have
> > been in core Octave for some time now. I think it is okay, to delete the
> > 'arpack' package from Octave-Forge SVN at this point. Any objections t
fre, 05 02 2010 kl. 09:19 +0100, skrev Massimiliano Culpo:
> 1 - I recently updated some packages on OF, and I was wondering if the
> next release will be made with the method described in:
>
> http://octave.sourceforge.net/test/developers.html
>
> or with the usual procedure.
I'm working on thi
Hi Michael ,
I am studying a solution to avoid repetitions of the same code with different
type
Please have a look at this
#include "simple.h"
#include // avoid errmsg "cell -- incomplete datatype"
#include // avoid errmsg "Oct.map -- invalid use undef type"
enum ov_t_id
{
.
};
int
Søren Hauberg wrote:
>
> Hi All
>
> If memory serves me correct, then the ARPACK functions (eigs, ...) have
> been in core Octave for some time now. I think it is okay, to delete the
> 'arpack' package from Octave-Forge SVN at this point. Any objections to
> this?
>
> Søren
>
>
Sure go ahe
Hi,
1 - I recently updated some packages on OF, and I was wondering if the
next release will be made with the method described in:
http://octave.sourceforge.net/test/developers.html
or with the usual procedure.
2 - Is there some standard way to provide examples along with a package?
I know that
