søn, 21 03 2010 kl. 23:57 -0400, skrev Carnë Draug:
> On 21 March 2010 23:41, Søren Hauberg wrote:
> > BTW. I was thinking that perhaps 'error', 'warning' and 'print_usage'
> > should be highlighted in a different colour (red would be nice) to
> > indicate that these functions deal with errors. No
On 21 March 2010 23:41, Søren Hauberg wrote:
> BTW. I was thinking that perhaps 'error', 'warning' and 'print_usage'
> should be highlighted in a different colour (red would be nice) to
> indicate that these functions deal with errors. Not sure if it is a good
> idea, though, but I wanted to menti
søn, 21 03 2010 kl. 23:35 -0400, skrev Carnë Draug:
> I just noticed that the functions 'rows' and 'columns' were also left
> out of the selection because they do not exist in matlab (I didn't
> made it, got a script to do it so I only noticed now). Can you
> foresee them being deprecated or remov
I just noticed that the functions 'rows' and 'columns' were also left
out of the selection because they do not exist in matlab (I didn't
made it, got a script to do it so I only noticed now). Can you
foresee them being deprecated or removed in any time soon?
Carnë Draug
-
søn, 21 03 2010 kl. 22:04 -0400, skrev Carnë Draug:
> I don't mention changing the highlight. It can highlight both % and #.
> What I'm asking is which one of them, would the text editor use when
> using their fancy features to comment text automatically. Since you
> are the original developer of t
On 21 March 2010 14:49, Søren Hauberg wrote:
>> Although I from one point I
>> can understand that we'd like to mark it and use the #, if other users
>> share their code with matlab users in a regular basis, they might have
>> problems. Either way, it makes no difference to me. What's your
>> opin
søn, 21 03 2010 kl. 01:17 -0400, skrev Carnë Draug:
> Also, you mentioned before that it would be preferable to use octave #
> and #{ to insert comments automatically. Is there any chance that
> octave will ever accept # better than % ?
I don't understand the question. Basically, Octave treats '#'
søn, 21 03 2010 kl. 14:24 +1000, skrev Florent Angly:
> On 12/03/10 06:51, Søren Hauberg wrote:
> > The main problem seems to be that both Octave and 'optim' comes with an
> > implementation of
> > 'fminbnd'. I don't know which is better, but I don't like the
> > duplication.
> >
>
> Ok. I fo
Jaroslav Hajek wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 10:28 AM, David Bateman wrote:
>
>> Michael Creel wrote:
>>
>>> Internally, __bfgsmin.c uses feval to compute the function value. Perhaps
>>> that could be changed to work with anonymous functions. I think that this
>>> would be the hardest p
søn, 21 03 2010 kl. 10:28 +0100, skrev David Bateman:
> Michael Creel wrote:
> > Internally, __bfgsmin.c uses feval to compute the function value. Perhaps
> > that could be changed to work with anonymous functions. I think that this
> > would be the hardest part of making the change.
> >
> >
> H
søn, 21 03 2010 kl. 09:32 +0100, skrev Michael Creel:
> I have taken care of these warnings in my own code already. I'm
> planning on checking it in once I have it adapted to use the
> openmpi_ext package.
Okay, I checked in some stuff already, so you might get into conflicts.
> I am interested
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 10:28 AM, David Bateman wrote:
> Michael Creel wrote:
>> Internally, __bfgsmin.c uses feval to compute the function value. Perhaps
>> that could be changed to work with anonymous functions. I think that this
>> would be the hardest part of making the change.
>>
>>
> Here is
Michael Creel wrote:
> Internally, __bfgsmin.c uses feval to compute the function value. Perhaps
> that could be changed to work with anonymous functions. I think that this
> would be the hardest part of making the change.
>
>
Here is a code snippet that is needed to accept a function as the fir
On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 9:35 PM, Søren Hauberg wrote:
> lør, 20 03 2010 kl. 19:36 +0100, skrev Michael Creel:
> > I think that replacing list with cell arrays is pretty
> > straightforward. I did that for samin and bfgsmin quite a while ago,
> > when lists were deprecated. I suggest that the auth
14 matches
Mail list logo
