On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 12:56 AM, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
wrote:
> So when a new package is rolled out, for example bim-1.0.1.tar.gz, when
> you untar it, it is unpredictable whether the directory created is
> called "bim" or "bim-1.0.1." Some packages use the former name
> convention, some pack
So when a new package is rolled out, for example bim-1.0.1.tar.gz, when
you untar it, it is unpredictable whether the directory created is
called "bim" or "bim-1.0.1." Some packages use the former name
convention, some packages use the latter.
As the FreeBSD maintainer of the octave-forge-* po
I guess the subject says it all.
M.
--
Benefiting from Server Virtualization: Beyond Initial Workload
Consolidation -- Increasing the use of server virtualization is a top
priority.Virtualization can reduce costs, simpli
Subject: Re: [OctDev] request to register as a developer
From: w4nderl...@gmail.com
Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2011 20:59:33 +0200
CC: carlo.defa...@gmail.com; pio.gianv...@gmail.com
To: lmar...@users.sourceforge.net
Hello,
sorry i misread, you told you had no need to implement fuzzy set theory
op
> Subject: Re: [OctDev] request to register as a developer
> From: carlo.defa...@gmail.com
> Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 23:53:38 +0200
> CC: w4nderl...@gmail.com; octave-dev@lists.sourceforge.net;
> pio.gianv...@gmail.com
> To: lmar...@users.sourceforge.net
>
>
> On 18 Apr 2011, at 23:17, L. Markow
The arburg function reference is currently:
RETURNED VALUES:
a %% [polynomial/vector] list of (P+1) autoregression coeffic-
%% ients; for data input x(n) and white noise e(n),
%% the model is
%% P+1
Carlo,
I would like my developer status to remain active, please.
At the very least, I wish to improve a number of sigproc
functions when I can find time.
Thanks,
Peter
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 04:54:13PM +0200, c. wrote:
>
> Ok, I decided to be more conservative and checked (using the very hand
On 19 Apr 2011, at 09:52, Søren Hauberg wrote:
> man, 18 04 2011 kl. 21:48 +0200, skrev Carlo de Falco:
>> I remember David used to periodically check the list of octave-forge
>> developers in order to disable
>> those that had been inactive for a long time and keep the total number of
>> devel
2011/4/19 Carnë Draug :
> 2011/4/19 c. :
>> Do you think it would be possible to modify it
>> so that it lists users that did NOT commit since a given date?
>
> If you can give me (or a command that gives me) a list of all users,
> yes with no problem at all. Otherwise it would have to check all
>
2011/4/19 c. :
> Do you think it would be possible to modify it
> so that it lists users that did NOT commit since a given date?
If you can give me (or a command that gives me) a list of all users,
yes with no problem at all. Otherwise it would have to check all
commits from revision 1 in order t
On 19 Apr 2011, at 02:05, Carnë Draug wrote:
> On 18 April 2011 20:48, Carlo de Falco wrote:
>> Does anyone know how to easily get activity info for all registered
>> developers in order to select those that can be considered inactive?
>
> I just wrote a perl tiny script that lists all the use
man, 18 04 2011 kl. 21:48 +0200, skrev Carlo de Falco:
> I remember David used to periodically check the list of octave-forge
> developers in order to disable
> those that had been inactive for a long time and keep the total number of
> developers limited.
>
> I think that was a good idea and we
12 matches
Mail list logo
