On 24 September 2012 18:12, Paul Dreik wrote:
> Maybe it is good to rename the trunk _trunk or something (for the old
> repository), so people commiting to the wrong repository notice the
> difference. Unfortunately one then notices the change at a late stage,
> but that is better than committing
Maybe it is good to rename the trunk _trunk or something (for the old
repository), so people commiting to the wrong repository notice the
difference. Unfortunately one then notices the change at a late stage,
but that is better than committing and not knowing it was for a dead end
repository.
Paul
On 22 September 2012 02:23, Gustaf Mårtensson wrote:
> I was trying to get the database package running on my Octave
> istallation on a windows 7 (64-bit) system.
The database package is bitrotten. If you are able to discuss and
diagnose some of the errors you see, perhaps we can start working
to
On 23 September 2012 12:08, Carnë Draug wrote:
> Hi everyone
>
> with the upgrade in sourceforge the location for the repository
> changed so you should make a new checkout. See message below from
> sourceforge.
>
> Carnë
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: SourceForge.net
> Date:
On 24 Sep 2012, at 10:44, Juan Pablo Carbajal wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 10:21 AM, c. wrote:
>>
>> On 24 Sep 2012, at 09:58, Juan Pablo Carbajal wrote:
>>
>>> Which if itself is not a bad idea! releasePKG is working fine, we can
>>> make a script to generate the html of all packages.
>>
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 10:21 AM, c. wrote:
>
> On 24 Sep 2012, at 09:58, Juan Pablo Carbajal wrote:
>
>> Which if itself is not a bad idea! releasePKG is working fine, we can
>> make a script to generate the html of all packages.
>
> No, we do not want that. that's like the old monolithic build p
On 21 September 2012 16:10, adam aitkenhead wrote:
>> From: carandraug+...@gmail.com
>> Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 13:53:56 +0200
>>
>> On 21 September 2012 10:18, adam aitkenhead
>> wrote:
>> > The underlying read function has a different calling syntax from Matlab,
>> > as
>> > it reads both the he
On 24 Sep 2012, at 09:58, Juan Pablo Carbajal wrote:
> Which if itself is not a bad idea! releasePKG is working fine, we can
> make a script to generate the html of all packages.
No, we do not want that. that's like the old monolithic build process,
sounded like a good idea in the beginning, pr
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 9:48 AM, c. wrote:
>
> On 24 Sep 2012, at 09:23, Juan Pablo Carbajal wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 8:54 AM, Carnë Draug
>> wrote:
>>> On 23 September 2012 14:47, Juan Pablo Carbajal wrote:
@Carnë: If you need help updatign the text in the website let me know,
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 9:50 AM, c. wrote:
>
> On 24 Sep 2012, at 08:55, Paul Dreik wrote:
>
>> That is why I asked if there is a package that improves from it - I
>> guess a package has to use multiple source files, where at least some
>> are nondependent so they can be compiled in parallel.
>
>
On 24 Sep 2012, at 08:55, Paul Dreik wrote:
> That is why I asked if there is a package that improves from it - I
> guess a package has to use multiple source files, where at least some
> are nondependent so they can be compiled in parallel.
openmpi_ext is a good example for this, it has many .c
On 24 Sep 2012, at 09:23, Juan Pablo Carbajal wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 8:54 AM, Carnë Draug wrote:
>> On 23 September 2012 14:47, Juan Pablo Carbajal wrote:
>>> @Carnë: If you need help updatign the text in the website let me know,
>>> we should use this opportunity to put it up to date
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 9:09 AM, Claudio Freire wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 3:55 AM, Paul Dreik wrote:
>> time make
>> 72 seconds
>> make clean (to get the caches warm. note, make clean does not remove
>> slicotlibrary.a. Maybe it should?)
>> time make
>> 18 seconds
>> make clean
>> time mak
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 8:54 AM, Carnë Draug wrote:
> On 23 September 2012 14:47, Juan Pablo Carbajal wrote:
>> @Carnë: If you need help updatign the text in the website let me know,
>> we should use this opportunity to put it up to date.
>
> I was more of a midndset to move the instructions to t
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 3:55 AM, Paul Dreik wrote:
> time make
> 72 seconds
> make clean (to get the caches warm. note, make clean does not remove
> slicotlibrary.a. Maybe it should?)
> time make
> 18 seconds
> make clean
> time make -j4
> 12 seconds
> make clean
> rm slicotlibrary.a
> time make -
15 matches
Mail list logo
