Re: [OctDev] [Pkg-octave-devel] secs1d needs bim

2012-06-06 Thread Juan Pablo Carbajal
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 8:55 PM, Rafael Laboissiere wrote: > * c. [2012-06-05 20:35]: > >> gmsh is actually just an optional dependency of msh which is needed >> only by two functions which call it via a "system ()" call. >> >> If gmsh causes so much trouble I can just change those functions so >>

Re: [OctDev] [Pkg-octave-devel] secs1d needs bim

2012-06-06 Thread Rafael Laboissiere
* c. [2012-06-05 20:35]: > gmsh is actually just an optional dependency of msh which is needed > only by two functions which call it via a "system ()" call. > > If gmsh causes so much trouble I can just change those functions so > that they check whether a gmsh binary is available and give a war

Re: [OctDev] [Pkg-octave-devel] secs1d needs bim

2012-06-05 Thread c.
On 5 Jun 2012, at 19:40, Thomas Weber wrote: > msh uses gmsh gmsh is actually just an optional dependency of msh which is needed only by two functions which call it via a "system ()" call. If gmsh causes so much trouble I can just change those functions so that they check whether a gmsh binary

Re: [OctDev] [Pkg-octave-devel] secs1d needs bim

2012-06-05 Thread Thomas Weber
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 08:34:18AM +0200, c. wrote: > Thomas, > while looking at the discussion about the control package I just > noticed this thread in the Debian Octave mailing list > > Thomas Weber tweber at debian.org Tue May 29 17:35:04 UTC 2012: > > Hi, > > > > we removed octave-bim som

Re: [OctDev] [Pkg-octave-devel] secs1d needs bim

2012-06-04 Thread c.
Thomas, while looking at the discussion about the control package I just noticed this thread in the Debian Octave mailing list Thomas Weber tweber at debian.org Tue May 29 17:35:04 UTC 2012: > Hi, > > we removed octave-bim some time ago (it depended on octave-msh, which was > not installable