Re: [OctDev] HTML function reference

2009-02-08 Thread David Bateman
Søren Hauberg wrote: > søn, 08 02 2009 kl. 09:05 +0100, skrev David Bateman: > >> We could perhaps even allow >> the package manager to do that.. >> > > I don't really understand what you're hinting at. > Just that if we are allows the package owners to upload part of that process mi

Re: [OctDev] HTML function reference

2009-02-08 Thread Carlo de Falco
On 8 Feb 2009, at 09:10, Søren Hauberg wrote: >> >> be easily done via PHP code for example... > > I'm not sure if you can actually run PHP (or similar) code on the > Octave-Forge servers. Does anybody know this? Yes, it seems to be possible, http://apps.sourceforge.net/trac/sitedocs/wiki/Projec

Re: [OctDev] HTML function reference

2009-02-08 Thread Søren Hauberg
søn, 08 02 2009 kl. 09:05 +0100, skrev David Bateman: > Søren Hauberg wrote: > > The problem with the alphabetical list is that it is hard to create it. > > Let's assume you make a release of one of your packages, and you have > > added a new function, 'my_new_function', to your package. Then, the

Re: [OctDev] HTML function reference

2009-02-08 Thread Søren Hauberg
lør, 07 02 2009 kl. 23:53 +, skrev Carlo de Falco: > On 7 Feb 2009, at 17:41, Søren Hauberg wrote: > > > The problem with the alphabetical list is that it is hard to create > > it. > > Let's assume you make a release of one of your packages, and you have > > added a new function, 'my_new_fun

Re: [OctDev] HTML function reference

2009-02-08 Thread David Bateman
Søren Hauberg wrote: > The problem with the alphabetical list is that it is hard to create it. > Let's assume you make a release of one of your packages, and you have > added a new function, 'my_new_function', to your package. Then, the page > listing functions starting with 'm' will have to be upd

Re: [OctDev] HTML function reference

2009-02-08 Thread David Bateman
Søren Hauberg wrote: > lør, 07 02 2009 kl. 18:07 +0100, skrev David Bateman: > >> I'm not sure I like the way the manual is displayed as one of the side >> menus of the function reference. Sure have a side menu for the manual >> on the web site, but a different one from the function reference

Re: [OctDev] HTML function reference

2009-02-07 Thread Carlo de Falco
On 7 Feb 2009, at 17:41, Søren Hauberg wrote: > The problem with the alphabetical list is that it is hard to create > it. > Let's assume you make a release of one of your packages, and you have > added a new function, 'my_new_function', to your package. Then, the > page > listing functions st

Re: [OctDev] HTML function reference

2009-02-07 Thread Søren Hauberg
lør, 07 02 2009 kl. 18:07 +0100, skrev David Bateman: > I'm not sure I like the way the manual is displayed as one of the side > menus of the function reference. Sure have a side menu for the manual > on the web site, but a different one from the function reference How about something like what

Re: [OctDev] HTML function reference

2009-02-07 Thread Søren Hauberg
lør, 07 02 2009 kl. 18:07 +0100, skrev David Bateman: > I'm not sure I like the way the manual is displayed as one of the side > menus of the function reference. Yeah, I see your point. I'll see what I can do to change this. > Sure have a side menu for the manual > on the web site, but a diff

Re: [OctDev] HTML function reference

2009-02-07 Thread David Bateman
Søren Hauberg wrote: > Hi Octave-Forgers (CC: maintainers list) > > I've updated my package for generating HTML files from help texts. The > source is available at > > http://hauberg.org/generate_html > > The code requires a checkout of Octave that includes the > reimplementation of the help system

[OctDev] HTML function reference

2009-02-07 Thread Søren Hauberg
Hi Octave-Forgers (CC: maintainers list) I've updated my package for generating HTML files from help texts. The source is available at http://hauberg.org/generate_html The code requires a checkout of Octave that includes the reimplementation of the help system as m-files. Using the package I've