søn, 17 01 2010 kl. 18:04 +0100, skrev Thomas Weber:
> Sorry it took me so long to respond, but the changed test fails for me.
> I had to remove some "@" in the tests, see the attached diff.
Doh! Of course a change like the one you've proposed is needed. I've
made this change. Hope that solves thi
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 01:07:20PM +0100, Søren Hauberg wrote:
> tir, 29 12 2009 kl. 10:57 +0100, skrev Thomas Weber:
> > > > Should I interpret the total silence on this to be a sign that
> > > > a) I'm the only one seeing this test failure?
> > >
> > > No I see it as well.
> > >
> > > > b) nob
tir, 29 12 2009 kl. 10:57 +0100, skrev Thomas Weber:
> > > Should I interpret the total silence on this to be a sign that
> > > a) I'm the only one seeing this test failure?
> >
> > No I see it as well.
> >
> > > b) nobody actually cares about the image package?
> >
> > I do care, I just didn't
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 10:44:43AM +0100, Søren Hauberg wrote:
> tir, 29 12 2009 kl. 10:14 +0100, skrev Thomas Weber:
> > On Sun, Dec 06, 2009 at 07:24:44PM +0100, Thomas Weber wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I get an error in qtdecomp's testsuite when using Octave 3.2.3; it works
> > > with 3.0.5,
tir, 29 12 2009 kl. 10:14 +0100, skrev Thomas Weber:
> On Sun, Dec 06, 2009 at 07:24:44PM +0100, Thomas Weber wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I get an error in qtdecomp's testsuite when using Octave 3.2.3; it works
> > with 3.0.5, though. SVN rev is 6599.
> >
> > =
On Sun, Dec 06, 2009 at 07:24:44PM +0100, Thomas Weber wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I get an error in qtdecomp's testsuite when using Octave 3.2.3; it works
> with 3.0.5, though. SVN rev is 6599.
>
>
> octave:1> test qtdecomp
> PASSES
Hi,
I get an error in qtdecomp's testsuite when using Octave 3.2.3; it works
with 3.0.5, though. SVN rev is 6599.
octave:1> test qtdecomp
PASSES 14 out of 14 tests
octave:2> version
ans = 3.0.1
