-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
David Bateman wrote:
> Alois Schlögl wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> John W. Eaton wrote:
>>
>>> On 22-Apr-2009, Alois Schlögl wrote:
>>>
>>> | (The programm slowed down on Matlab from 13.0 to 66.15 s, though).
>>>
>>
Alois Schlögl wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> John W. Eaton wrote:
>
>> On 22-Apr-2009, Alois Schlögl wrote:
>>
>> | (The programm slowed down on Matlab from 13.0 to 66.15 s, though).
>>
>> If you care about this, then I guess you should complain to the
>> MathWorks
Alois Schlögl schrieb:
> It would be nice, if developers aiming at compatibility between octave
> and matlab could feel at home here.
>
> I looked also at David's suggestion to use oct2mat.
>
> line 188: gsub("[\\]$","...");
> caused this error:
> awk: /home/schloegl/matlab/oct2mat/oct2mat: l
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 11:18 AM, Alois Schlögl
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Jaroslav Hajek wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 4:18 PM, Alois Schlögl
>> wrote:
>>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>
>>> David Bateman wrote:
Alois Schlögl wro
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 10:58 AM, Alois Schlögl
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> John W. Eaton wrote:
>> On 22-Apr-2009, Alois Schlögl wrote:
>>
>> | (The programm slowed down on Matlab from 13.0 to 66.15 s, though).
>>
>> If you care about this, then I guess you should
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jaroslav Hajek wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 4:18 PM, Alois Schlögl
> wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> David Bateman wrote:
>>> Alois Schlögl wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
John W. Eaton wrote:
> On 22-Apr-2009, Alois Schlögl wrote:
>
> | (The programm slowed down on Matlab from 13.0 to 66.15 s, though).
>
> If you care about this, then I guess you should complain to the
> MathWorks about the performance of their produc
Alois Schlögl wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> David Bateman wrote:
>
>> Alois Schlögl wrote:
>>
>>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>
>>>
>>> As some of you might know, my other pet project besides Octave, is
>>> BioSig http://biosig.sf.net.
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 1:27 PM, Jaroslav Hajek wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 4:18 PM, Alois Schlögl
> wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > David Bateman wrote:
> >> Alois Schlögl wrote:
> >>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> >>> Hash: SHA1
> >>>
> >>> 2) C
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 4:18 PM, Alois Schlögl wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> David Bateman wrote:
>> Alois Schlögl wrote:
>>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>
>>>
>>> As some of you might know, my other pet project besides Octave, is
>>> BioSig h
ons, 22 04 2009 kl. 16:18 +0200, skrev Alois Schlögl:
> BTW, what are the arguments in favor of using octave-only coding style ?
It's superior :-)
I find reading code that uses Octave extensions are much more easy to
read. Therefore, I heavily use them in my own developments.
> This seems to sug
On 22-Apr-2009, Alois Schlögl wrote:
| (The programm slowed down on Matlab from 13.0 to 66.15 s, though).
If you care about this, then I guess you should complain to the
MathWorks about the performance of their product...
| BTW, what are the arguments in favor of using octave-only coding style ?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
David Bateman wrote:
> Alois Schlögl wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>>
>> As some of you might know, my other pet project besides Octave, is
>> BioSig http://biosig.sf.net. BioSig is designed in such a way that it
>> can
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 12:31 AM, David Bateman wrote:
> Alois Schlögl wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>>
>> As some of you might know, my other pet project besides Octave, is
>> BioSig http://biosig.sf.net. BioSig is designed in such a way that it
>> can be used with
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 6:12 PM, Alois Schlögl wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> As some of you might know, my other pet project besides Octave, is
> BioSig http://biosig.sf.net. BioSig is designed in such a way that it
> can be used with both, Matlab and Octave. Mostl
ons, 22 04 2009 kl. 00:31 +0200, skrev David Bateman:
> > 2) Coding style:
> > Octave understands a superset of commands compared to matlab, and it
> > seems the current policy is to enforce the "octave style" and make the
> > use of toolboxes incompatible for a use with Matlab. Is not it sensible
Alois Schlögl wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> As some of you might know, my other pet project besides Octave, is
> BioSig http://biosig.sf.net. BioSig is designed in such a way that it
> can be used with both, Matlab and Octave. Mostly for performance reason,
> we can
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
As some of you might know, my other pet project besides Octave, is
BioSig http://biosig.sf.net. BioSig is designed in such a way that it
can be used with both, Matlab and Octave. Mostly for performance reason,
we cannot abandon support for Matlab [1,2
18 matches
Mail list logo
