Re: [OctDev] linear-algebra: Nonnegative matrix fatorization

2012-04-13 Thread Juan Pablo Carbajal
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 4:07 AM, Jesse Rosenstock wrote: >> If there is no complaints/observations/comments in 3 days I will move >> them to inst. > > Would it make sense to have the interface more like this? > > http://www.mathworks.co.uk/help/toolbox/stats/nnmf.html > > That is, one nnmf functio

Re: [OctDev] linear-algebra: Nonnegative matrix fatorization

2012-04-12 Thread Jesse Rosenstock
> If there is no complaints/observations/comments in 3 days I will move > them to inst. Would it make sense to have the interface more like this? http://www.mathworks.co.uk/help/toolbox/stats/nnmf.html That is, one nnmf function, where the algorithm is chosen by an 'algorithm' argument, and the

[OctDev] linear-algebra: Nonnegative matrix fatorization

2012-04-11 Thread Juan Pablo Carbajal
Hi all, I am about to add this functions to linear-algebra. http://octave.svn.sf.net/viewvc/octave/trunk/octave-forge/main/linear-algebra/devel/ If there is no complaints/observations/comments in 3 days I will move them to inst. Thanks -- M. Sc. Juan Pablo Carbajal - PhD Student Universi