On 17 October 2012 13:07, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
> * c. [2012-10-17 09:23]:
>>
>> On 16 Oct 2012, at 02:21, Carnë Draug wrote:
>>
>>> I have removed the combinatorics and physical-constants packages.
>>>
>>> They had been moved into the miscellaneous package some months ago and
>>> since a new
* c. [2012-10-17 09:23]:
>
> On 16 Oct 2012, at 02:21, Carnë Draug wrote:
>
>> I have removed the combinatorics and physical-constants packages.
>>
>> They had been moved into the miscellaneous package some months ago and
>> since a new release of it was made, I have also released these two as
>
On 17 Oct 2012, at 13:01, Carnë Draug wrote:
>> Carnë,
>>
>> I do agree with the move of physical_constant into the miscellaneous package
>> as it reduces the total number of packages.
>> Was it really necessary, though, to change the names of all the constants?
>> This breaks all existing code
On 17 October 2012 09:23, c. wrote:
>
> On 16 Oct 2012, at 02:21, Carnë Draug wrote:
>
>> Hi everyone
>>
>> I have removed the combinatorics and physical-constants packages.
>>
>> They had been moved into the miscellaneous package some months ago and
>> since a new release of it was made, I have a
On 16 Oct 2012, at 02:21, Carnë Draug wrote:
> Hi everyone
>
> I have removed the combinatorics and physical-constants packages.
>
> They had been moved into the miscellaneous package some months ago and
> since a new release of it was made, I have also released these two as
> well. They are em
Hi everyone
I have removed the combinatorics and physical-constants packages.
They had been moved into the miscellaneous package some months ago and
since a new release of it was made, I have also released these two as
well. They are empty packages, only have a dummy file and are
dependent on the
