On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 10:09 AM, Søren Hauberg wrote:
> fre, 27 02 2009 kl. 14:03 +0100, skrev Jaroslav Hajek:
>> in case anyone is interested, I committed today into the "general"
>> package an initial m-file implementation of parcellfun.
>> parcellfun is supposed to be able to evaluate a given f
fre, 27 02 2009 kl. 14:03 +0100, skrev Jaroslav Hajek:
> in case anyone is interested, I committed today into the "general"
> package an initial m-file implementation of parcellfun.
> parcellfun is supposed to be able to evaluate a given function for
> multiple sets of input arguments using multipl
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 4:50 PM, Joe Vornehm Jr. wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 8:47 AM, Søren Hauberg wrote:
>>
>> fre, 27 02 2009 kl. 14:03 +0100, skrev Jaroslav Hajek:
>> > in case anyone is interested, I committed today into the "general"
>> > package an initial m-file implementation of par
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 8:47 AM, Søren Hauberg wrote:
> fre, 27 02 2009 kl. 14:03 +0100, skrev Jaroslav Hajek:
> > in case anyone is interested, I committed today into the "general"
> > package an initial m-file implementation of parcellfun.
> > parcellfun is supposed to be able to evaluate a giv
fre, 27 02 2009 kl. 14:03 +0100, skrev Jaroslav Hajek:
> in case anyone is interested, I committed today into the "general"
> package an initial m-file implementation of parcellfun.
> parcellfun is supposed to be able to evaluate a given function for
> multiple sets of input arguments using multipl
hi all,
in case anyone is interested, I committed today into the "general"
package an initial m-file implementation of parcellfun.
parcellfun is supposed to be able to evaluate a given function for
multiple sets of input arguments using multiple processes.
Given N, the function spawns N subproces
