f...@star.sr.bham.ac.uk wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Thank you very much for your comments. Here I have some figures of how
> slow Octave 3.6.2 is in my system compared with the previous version
> 3.2.4. For the same script the performance is as follows:
>
> Version 3.6.2: 1514 seconds,
> version 3.2.4: 132
Hello,
Thank you very much for your comments. Here I have some figures of how
slow Octave 3.6.2 is in my system compared with the previous version
3.2.4. For the same script the performance is as follows:
Version 3.6.2: 1514 seconds,
version 3.2.4: 132 seconds.
That is, the newer version 3.6.2 f
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 11:49 PM, Luca Favatella wrote:
> How slow is it? If it is a half and you are using
> parallel/asynchronous programming it may be bad usage of the second
> core (compilation flag?).
>
> BTW In order to get a rough performance evaluation of your script, you
> can use tic/toc
On 20 July 2012 22:02, wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I am writing to the mailing list because GNU Octave 3.6.2 is very slow in
> my system. I am using Kubuntu 12.04 in a dual core Dell XPS M1330. When I
> write slow, I compare with Octave 3.2.4 that I had with Kubuntu 11.10 in
> the same computer, runni
