On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 09:06:36PM +0100, Carnë Draug wrote:
> Hi
>
> since no one seems to know the "right answer" to the following
> calculation "dilate(eye(3),[1,0,0,0])", and the one on the test was
> clearly wrong, I simply commented it out. There should be no failing
> tests now.
Thanks for
Hi
since no one seems to know the "right answer" to the following
calculation "dilate(eye(3),[1,0,0,0])", and the one on the test was
clearly wrong, I simply commented it out. There should be no failing
tests now.
Carnë
Hi
I got someone to test this in MatLab for comparison. Those assertions
also fail there and the new version of our image package does
calculates the dilation like MatLab (except when using odd sized
Structuring Elements). With a SE, 4 pixels wide MatLab considers pixel
#2 the center while our ima
Hey,
just fixed that. The assert was wrong. The dilation of eye(3) by [ 1 0
0] is [ 0 0 0 ; 1 0 0 ; 0 1 0 ] and not [ 0 1 0 ; 0 0 1 ; 0 0 0 ] as
was given to assert as the right answer.
But for the last assert (which seems to also fail in the new version)
I don't know the right answer. It uses an
