[OctDev] Referenced function that does not exist in documentation of geometry package

Hi, There is a function called polygonCentroid that is referenced in centroidfunction description and does not exists in documentation and neither in geometry package. Thanks. -- Thiago Coelho Prado -

Re: [OctDev] signal package: possible bug on fir2 with patch (please review)

On 9 August 2012 03:11, Mike Miller wrote: > On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 10:14 AM, Carnë Draug wrote: >> On 6 July 2012 03:11, Mike Miller wrote: >>> >>> The only thing that is not clear to me is whether this matches ML >>> behavior, and whether we care, e.g. if the caller passes in a 4th arg >>> too

[OctDev] [new package] Least Squares Spectral Analysis: lssa released

Hi everyone the package lssa (Least Squares Spectral Analysis) by Ben Lewis as just just been released. This is the first release of the package (even though it's version 0.1.1). Enjoy octave responsibly. Carnë -- Live S

Re: [OctDev] signal package: possible bug on fir2 with patch (please review)

On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 1:53 PM, Carnë Draug wrote: > On 9 August 2012 03:11, Mike Miller wrote: >> >> Finally got back to this, it's now closer to what you showed here. >> It's clear that Matlab is forcing the 4th argument to always be a >> power of 2, even though that's not in the help text. I i

Re: [OctDev] signal package: possible bug on fir2 with patch (please review)

On 14 August 2012 20:02, Mike Miller wrote: > On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 1:53 PM, Carnë Draug wrote: >> On 9 August 2012 03:11, Mike Miller wrote: >>> >>> Finally got back to this, it's now closer to what you showed here. >>> It's clear that Matlab is forcing the 4th argument to always be a >>> powe

Re: [OctDev] signal package: possible bug on fir2 with patch (please review)

On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 3:59 PM, Carnë Draug wrote: > On 14 August 2012 20:02, Mike Miller wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 1:53 PM, Carnë Draug wrote: >>> On 9 August 2012 03:11, Mike Miller wrote: Finally got back to this, it's now closer to what you showed here. It's clear that

Re: [OctDev] signal package: possible bug on fir2 with patch (please review)

On 14 August 2012 21:33, Mike Miller wrote: > On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 3:59 PM, Carnë Draug wrote: >> On 14 August 2012 20:02, Mike Miller wrote: >>> On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 1:53 PM, Carnë Draug wrote: On 9 August 2012 03:11, Mike Miller wrote: > > Finally got back to this, it's now

Re: [OctDev] signal package: possible bug on fir2 with patch (please review)

On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 4:54 PM, Carnë Draug wrote: > On 14 August 2012 21:33, Mike Miller wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 3:59 PM, Carnë Draug wrote: >>> On 14 August 2012 20:02, Mike Miller wrote: On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 1:53 PM, Carnë Draug wrote: > On 9 August 2012 03:11, Mike Mill

Re: [OctDev] signal package: possible bug on fir2 with patch (please review)

On 14 August 2012 22:19, Mike Miller wrote: > On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 4:54 PM, Carnë Draug wrote: >> On 14 August 2012 21:33, Mike Miller wrote: >>> On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 3:59 PM, Carnë Draug wrote: On 14 August 2012 20:02, Mike Miller wrote: > On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 1:53 PM, Carnë D

Re: [OctDev] signal package: possible bug on fir2 with patch (please review)

On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 5:33 PM, Carnë Draug wrote: > On 14 August 2012 22:19, Mike Miller wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 4:54 PM, Carnë Draug wrote: >>> On 14 August 2012 21:33, Mike Miller wrote: On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 3:59 PM, Carnë Draug wrote: > On 14 August 2012 20:02, Mike Mi

Re: [OctDev] signal package: possible bug on fir2 with patch (please review)

On 14 August 2012 22:42, Mike Miller wrote: > On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 5:33 PM, Carnë Draug wrote: >> On 14 August 2012 22:19, Mike Miller wrote: >>> On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 4:54 PM, Carnë Draug wrote: On 14 August 2012 21:33, Mike Miller wrote: > On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 3:59 PM, Carnë

Re: [OctDev] pei_tseng_notch function failing unit test

On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 2:44 AM, Dr. Alexander Klein wrote: > Am 06.08.2012 um 01:31 schrieb Mike Miller: > >> Hi Alex, I see that you are the author of pei_tseng_notch, would you >> mind taking a look at the test failure? I get the same result as that >> shown in the report (reproduced below). > >>